Good tips. Kurt
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Edward Berner <[email protected]> wrote: > “cp” or “scp”? > > > > If ”scp”, then you might increase performance a bit by selecting a different > cipher, such as blowfish, using the “-c” option, and/or enabling compression > with the “-C” option. But I’d guess that the real problem is the size of > the SSH receive window on the destination host, and I think the only fix is > to update the ssh software. > > > > Here are a couple links with more information about the ssh receive window > issue: > > > > High Performance SSH/SCP - HPN-SSH > > http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hpn-ssh > > > > SSH, SCP, and SFTP Speed Improvements > > http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26505_01/html/E27003/gmdlh.html > > > > -- > > Edward > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of David McSpadden > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 9:49 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [NTSysADM] OT unix commands? > > > > When running a ‘cp’ from one lan to another over a 100MB circuit my > bandwidth utilization is 3MB but when running a ‘ftp’ to the same > destination I utilize over10MB of the same circuit? > > Why would an IBM AIX cp command be so different from an IBM AIX ftp command > as far as same files to the same locations over the same networks?? > > Doesn’t really make any sense to me?? > >
