My initial thought was raid 10  using 4tb (as thats what I use for servers) but 
I was reading about their SHR and it sounded interesting in that you can use 
different size drives and not lose any space

The MEDIA data that  is stored, is not "active" they do a job, transfer it 
there, after 6 months it gets erased.

but I plan to use the additional storage for doing local server backups as 
well. (I do back up there servers off-site but its not realistic to  pull 3TB 
over the wire).

MY thought was 6 drives in raid10, then use the 2 remainig drives to copy what 
is deemed critical off the raid10



 


Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:44:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] SHR vs Traditional RAID/RED drives
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

The WD NAS drives are only rated for groups of up to 6 and aimed squarely at 
the consumer market. They're rated for something along the lines of 180TB/year 
and only an error rate of 1x10^14.
The Red Pro drives are slightly better and built for 8-16 bay units backed by a 
5 year warranty, have a 7.2K speed and a much better 1x10^15 error rate and 
warrantied for 550TB/year written, also dropping in capacity to 4TB.  

If data is critical then move to their WD RE series drives again a 550TB/year 
rating along with 7.2K spindle and 5 year warranty with an even better 1x10^16 
error rate. 
If you need the density you pay for it in reliability currently, be prepared to 
keep multiple copies. You mentioned 'terabytes of data' - how hot/cold is it? 
Also if you're using anything above 1TB drives please don't use RAID5 you'll 
just be kicking yourself later :( Nathan Shelby

Lead Systems Engineer
– Quote Wizard

[email protected] /
206-753-2626

Malo Periculosam
Libertatem Quam Quietum Servitium


On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:00 AM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote:



Hi all,

I'm looking to drop one of these in at customer site, 
https://www.synology.com/en-us/products/DS1815+
I'm curious to know if anyone has elected to use their proprietary raid 
SHR/SHR2, and if so how it stacks up to traditional raid in terms of 
performance.

And on a separate  note , has anyone jumped onto  the  WD RED "NAS" drives yet?

I like the idea of 6TB for 270.00, but not crazy about 54k speed or 3 yr 
warranty
http://www.amazon.com/Western-Digital-3-5-inch-IntelliPower-WD60EFRX/dp/B00LO3KR96/ref=pd_bxgy_pc_text_y

however ,  226.00 for a 4TB 72k with a 5 year warranty does sit a little better

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LO3KRM8

any feedback is appreciated



                                          


                                          

Reply via email to