Really the whole issue has nothing to do with freeware, but whether you might 
be in breach of a license? (which can equally happen when using pair-for 
software). Why don’t you read the license attached to the software if you are 
that concerned.

The time-sheeting thing is not a technical problem – this seems to be asking 
you to do work on your own time, that you’re not getting paid for.

Cheers
Ken

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of D R
Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] Freeware in a corporate setting

This is an open question to everyone on this list. Thanks in advance.

Question: What would you do if a company 'requires' you to download freeware to 
be used in a corporate setting?

Issue: Currently on a contract and the employer is requiring the technician(s) 
to download software from the net to wipe hard drives for a computer swap out. 
Old computer needs the hard drive wiped. But, they want the technician(s) to 
download freeware and use that in a corporate setting. But, these computers are 
in a corporate/bank environment. They have allocated only so much time per 
machine to perform a capture/backup of the user profile and a restore to be 
done. Once the restore is complete, they do want the user to verify if all of 
there software, (MS Office, etc.,) before the wipe is done on the drive.

I don't mind using freeware to work on mine, or a friend's computer, to get 
something taken care of. But requiring the technician to download and use 
freeware in a corporate setting is something entirely different. Don't most of 
the EULA/GNU License agreements stipulate it is ok for the software to be used, 
for individual use, but in business/corporate setting that a multi-use/group 
license must be purchased?

Also, if you were the technician, and a manager, who is in charge of this 
contract, told you it was 'ok' to take home a laptop/desktop so you could 
finish doing the wipe of the hard drive, after you have submitted your time, 
wouldn't you find that suspect? I do. And on so many levels, too.

Thoughts?

--
Daniel Rodriguez
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Reply via email to