We have the DataOn CiB-9470 V12 (backup target for Veeam) have been pretty 
happy with it from a hardware standpoint.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Eric Morrison
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] Storage Spaces Options for Backup Target

For our backup environment, we use DPM on Hyper-V on a SOFS for 
dedup<https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn891438(v=sc.12).aspx>. Time 
to replace the SOFS nodes and backend FC SAN as it's really old.

We're looking at a few options and I was curious if anyone had any experience 
with anything like this?


1.       DataOn CiB which has two nodes running Windows Server 2012 R2 and 
storage spaces as the SMB target for the DPM VMs.

a.       I personally like this option as it's only 4U and we would only half 
populate it with 34 drives to accomplish our usable space requirements. We 
could also expand up to 70 drives in the future to fully populate if we need 
more space and can even add one of their JBOD systems for additional space.

2.       SuperMicro CiB is also a two node system like DataOn.

a.       I don't care for this one as much, since it only has 24 drive capacity 
in 4U, compared to DataOn 70 drive capacity, and would require an additional 4U 
JBOD to reach the same amount of usable space as the DataOn.

3.       JBOD from any vendor, like SuperMicro and two rackmount boxes 
connected via SAS to the JBOD box.

a.       DataOn has an option like this where we'd have to supply our own 
server nodes, which is no problem. SuperMicro also has a 90 bay drive bay JBOD 
that we could use.

So far between option 1 and 2 is only around a $2k to $5k with SuperMicro 
solution being built on ThinkMate.com and DataOn quote after speaking with 
their sales people.

So besides DataOn and SuperMicro, are there any other inexpensive options to 
achieve around 160TB usable space as an SMB target?

Thanks!

Eric Morrison


Reply via email to