+ 1 on fortigate, have only had it for a couple of months but so far so good, support usually puts me right through to an engineer, only once I had to wait for a callback
Jean-Paul Natola ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Reimer, Mark <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Web Filtering Appliances We've been happy with Fortigate Firewall and web filter. Mark On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What do you have as your org's firewall? I'd investigate that first. We used to have a Barracuda 4xx (410? 400? The model number for it and our spam filter are similar), but I was not much of a fan. That might not have been the fault of the Barracuda, but it required some odd network configuration that I didn't like. Three years ago, when we got our Palo Alto firewalls, we got their web filtering package to go with it. It works very well. Kurt On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Gordon Pegue <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: A skosh over 8 years ago, at my prior job, I had an iPrism appliance for web traffic monitoring/filtering. I see that iPrism is now known as Edgewave iPrism and I’m looking over the details of what they offer. Having had no more interim experience with what’s in the market, my query to the group is simple: For those of you who manage a web filtering appliance: What are you using? What do you like/dislike about it? Would you buy it again if you had to start over? What are you paying for the service subscription? TIA Gordon
