For office msi?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50 PM
To: ntsysadm
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps of general interest...

Not for at least another 3 years, and possibly longer - we just signed an EA.

Kurt

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Then you are going to need to switch to something other than Microsoft Office.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:07 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps of general interest...
>
> Yes, but I prefer to "own" my software, not rent it. That way we can upgrade 
> at need, rather than when the vendor says so, and will probably spend far 
> less money doing so.
>
> The "own" in quotes merely points to not paying monthly rental - we all know 
> that commercial software is only licensed, not truly sold.
>
> I just don't want to be a piggybank for the software publishers - I don't 
> mind paying for good functionality, nor paying for ongoing support.
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Many big vendors today are pushing a cloud strategy, as it more 
>> readily facilitates ongoing revenue and supporting a smaller number 
>> of disparate configurations.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>  ASB
>>  http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
>>
>>  Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market…
>>
>>  GPG: 860D 40A1 4DA5 3AE1 B052 8F9F 07A1 F9D6 A549 8842
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Very interesting.
>>>
>>> MSFT is shoving very, very hard to push everyone into their cloud, 
>>> and this fits their strategy...
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Michael B. Smith 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/02/microsoft-is-laying-off-thousand
>>> > s
>>> > -of-staff/?ncid=rss
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to