We have on-prem Exchange and Sharepoint and SfB, so that shouldn't be
a problem, for now.

Kurt

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm just curious. Sorry if my question seemed overly blunt.
>
> My understanding was that Outlook, PowerPoint, and OneNote from MSI would 
> stop connecting to online services in 2018. But I can't find the resource 
> where I read that... perhaps I imagined it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:14 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps of general interest...
>
> I believe so. I'll have to check.
>
> At the worst, we have the MSI installs grandfathered in to whatever is 
> current.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> For office msi?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: ntsysadm
>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps of general interest...
>>
>> Not for at least another 3 years, and possibly longer - we just signed an EA.
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Then you are going to need to switch to something other than Microsoft 
>>> Office.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:07 PM
>>> To: ntsysadm
>>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps of general interest...
>>>
>>> Yes, but I prefer to "own" my software, not rent it. That way we can 
>>> upgrade at need, rather than when the vendor says so, and will probably 
>>> spend far less money doing so.
>>>
>>> The "own" in quotes merely points to not paying monthly rental - we all 
>>> know that commercial software is only licensed, not truly sold.
>>>
>>> I just don't want to be a piggybank for the software publishers - I don't 
>>> mind paying for good functionality, nor paying for ongoing support.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Many big vendors today are pushing a cloud strategy, as it more
>>>> readily facilitates ongoing revenue and supporting a smaller number
>>>> of disparate configurations.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>  ASB
>>>>  http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
>>>>
>>>>  Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market…
>>>>
>>>>  GPG: 860D 40A1 4DA5 3AE1 B052 8F9F 07A1 F9D6 A549 8842
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Very interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> MSFT is shoving very, very hard to push everyone into their cloud,
>>>>> and this fits their strategy...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Michael B. Smith
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/02/microsoft-is-laying-off-thousan
>>>>> > d
>>>>> > s
>>>>> > -of-staff/?ncid=rss
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to