http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/09/14/dhs-vs-kaspersky-lab-why-us-government-is-ditching-russian-software-giant.html

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As I've recommended Kaspersky for about a decade now, I'm interested in
> knowing your source. :-)
>
> I know that the USA is less and less happy with Russia... But I've not
> found anything that even seems official...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Leone
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 12:32 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NTSysADM] Dropping Kaspersky Av, who to replace it with?
>
> We use Kaspersky for our AV needs, and to be honest, it's worked out well
> for us. It's certainly caught things that McAfee, our previous AV solution,
> didn't. However, they have this slight problem with being a covert arm of
> the Russian government, apparently ..
>
> So we need to drop them, as the federal agencies are doing.
>
> There are lots of reviews, such as av-test.org, that we are looking at.
> But tell me, who do you have? And - more importantly - if you had your say
> in the matter, would you keep them?
>
> We're an sort of enterprise level organization, maybe 1K users, bunch of
> laptops issued to remote users. So far, all Win 7 for workstations, but
> obviously that will change in the future. Servers are all Win
> 2008/2012 R2 (so far). So we need something with a centralized console, to
> push out rules, updates, etc.
>
> We use Proofpoint as an email gateway, so it does mail scanning. We have
> Checkpoint firewalls for managing that sort of traffic.
>
> Thoughts?  I know I've heard good things about ESET and Sophos, among
> others. Just soliciting some real world opinions, along with our own
> research.
>
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rodriguez
[email protected]

Reply via email to