Good explanation - thanks for this.

Kurt

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:12 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Windows Server Essentials 2016 allows you to use Hyper-V on the host and
> Essentials Server as a VM. The product use rights allows one Operating
> System Environment (OSE) with Essentials and it must be Essentials.
> Basically you do the first part of the install and then cancel adding the
> Essentials role. You add the Hyper-V role only on the physical host. Then
> you create a VM that runs Essentials only and configure it as wish. So you
> can do AD, DNS, DHCP. You can not run any other VMs on that physical box.
> This is where the licensing comes in. Technically you could, legally you
> can’t.
>
>
>
> The bigger question is what version of Timberline are they using? And are
> they going to upgrade that also? If so, you have more issues to overcome.
>
>
>
> As others have suggested. Get the Server 2016 Standard. Install just the
> Hyper-V role on the physical box. Then install Server 2016 Standard in the
> first VM and add then add ADDS, configure your DNS and DHCP. Then add the
> Essentials role. Be careful with the Essentials role. If you decide you need
> certificate services on the server, don’t install them before the Essentials
> role. You’ll get error messages. The Essentials role installs certificate
> services as part of it’s install.
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 1:41 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server build recommendation
>
>
>
> What he said.
>
> It gives you lots more options going forward.
>
>
>
> On 1/26/2018 12:32 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
>
> And to clear this up a little for Kurt…
>
>
>
> Essentials is available as a Windows Role and as a separate SKU.
>
>
>
> The separate SKU has built-in limitations as to what it can do (and is
> cheaper because of that).
>
>
>
> Most of those limitations do not apply to the Windows Role.
>
>
>
> So buy Windows Standard. Put it on the Hyper-V host. Create a VM. Install
> Windows Standard with the Essentials Role for that VM. You can still add
> another Windows Server Standard VM if you want (this is all based on
> licensing – nothing is built into Windows to enforce licensing). And you can
> install your client VM, but you do need a separate license for that. To be
> legal. But Windows Standard doesn’t care.
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server build recommendation
>
>
>
> My apologies I was thinking normal server, not Essentials.  I'd recommend
> normal Server because Essentials can't be a HyperV host.  Essentials has a
> funky virtualization eula/rights that it can hyperv but only itself and then
> it's only useful for Azure backup.
>
> Windows 10 - you now need a SA/VL license to have it be headless.
>
> SMB licensing isn't a cheap as it once was IMHO.
>
> I honestly would bump the budget up to normal server, that gives you 2
> server in 1 hyperV host.  You can still set up the Essentials role for easy
> remote access for people.
>
>
>
> On 1/26/2018 11:55 AM, Brian Desmond wrote:
>
> Pretty much.
>
>
>
> I believe Essentials has the same license grant as standard (one guest
> server VM) but I wouldn't quote myself on that. You'd have to license
> additional VMs beyond that.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian Desmond
>
>
>
> w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 1:21 PM
>
> To: ntsysadm <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server build recommendation
>
>
>
> I've never played with Windows Essentials, and have very little experience
> with Hyper-V, so I'll need to do some more reading.
>
>
>
> Let me parrot back to you, to make sure I understood what you said.
>
>
>
> I can set up the new machine with Windows Essentials as a Hyper-V host, and
> use that, with the same media and license, to run a VM that will be the DC.
>
>
>
> Is that correct?
>
>
>
> If it is, could I also stand up a Win10 VM (with its own license, of
> course), and use that to run their property management software?
>
>
>
> How many VMs does a license for Windows Essentials support? I don't see a
> need for more than two at this point, and the hardware will certainly
> support their needs, but I want to get myself educated before I go in there
> and make a mess.
>
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Susan Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In SMB space I don't see VMware as the virtualization platform of
>
> choice. I see HyperV, not to mention in a single host, you either go
>
> with what we used to do:  Host is not domain joined, hanging off the
>
> dhcp/dns of the firewall with static entries.  Or what you can do what
>
> we do now in the 2012 R2 and later era which is domain join the host
>
> to the DC-VM and it doesn't freak out and boots just fine without DCHP/DNS.
>
>
>
> I wouldn't use VMware.  I would do HyperV, and I would make these VMs.
>
> You never know even in SMB when you have a need for a virtual machine
>
> to stand up and test something, or a need for another server to put
>
> the application on.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/25/2018 8:29 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>
>
>
> VMware really wants a DNS server at boot time. If your DNS server is a
>
> VM on that host, it isn't there for VMware.
>
>
>
> This is a problem, to say the least.
>
>
>
> It's really the only reason why I have a DC on it's own physical host
>
> in my server room.
>
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Susan Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Why two hosts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/25/2018 7:09 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>
>
>
> I had further discussion with them today.
>
>
>
> The LOB is Timberline property management software, and they're
>
> adamant about keeping it in-house. They were also set on Dell, so we
>
> finally settled on a Dell T430, with an H330 RAID card, and two 1tb
>
> NLSAS drives, and 16gb RAM. The Windows Essentials will come from
>
> Amazon for a lot less than what Dell was charging - and they weren't
>
> bundling Essentials with this machine anyway.
>
>
>
> They have moved their email to gmail (which was news to me - last I
>
> had heard from them they were still using their SBS 2003 Exchange).
>
>
>
> They also wanted to keep their RD1000 unit for backups, which seemed
>
> pretty reasonable - actually, they'll be getting a new RD1000 bundled
>
> into the new machine, and probably keep the old one for an emergency
>
> spare.
>
>
>
> I'm going to turn that server into a combined AD/DNS/DHCP and file
>
> server, and  I think I can convince them to keep their Timberline
>
> software on a domain-joined Win10 machine - I just gives me the
>
> shivers to install third party software on a DC.
>
>
>
> I didn't save them much on pricing (maybe $100-200), but I think I got
>
> them a much better machine.
>
>
>
> And, as a followup, once they have ordered it and it's in house, I'll
>
> be waling through their guy on setting it all up.
>
>
>
> If I could, I'd virtualize it all, but doing that right would involve
>
> two hosts, and more servers than they need, I think that it's pretty
>
> good the way we went.
>
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Susan E Bradley, CPA/CITP/CFF, GSEC
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> What LOB needs do they have?  What storage?
>
>
>
> Premise peeps:  The Gen 10 Microserver doesn't have the fans it once
>
> had, my peeps are recommending HP ML110e
>
>
>
> Cloud peeps:  Do they really need a server or a rethinking of what
>
> they do needs to be done and office 365/mapped drive to Sharefile or
>
> Google drive would be a better plan going forward.  What LOB is
>
> keeping the need for the on premise server?
>
>
>
> These days, check that chip to see if it will get a spectre/meltdown
>
> patch.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/25/2018 8:18 AM, Rick Berry wrote:
>
>
>
> I'd suggest the consideration of something aftermarket as an option
>
> for them (since you said the words 'property management company' and
>
> having supported a few of those in the past I'll make crass
>
> generalizations about budget
>
> limitations/thriftiness)
>
>
>
> www.buysellservers.com  ... you can go build a 1U dell for instance
>
> with what you want in it (like a real RAID card) and also still get a
>
> drac/warranty/etc at aftermarket prices.
>
>
>
> We normally do new ourselves, but I'm also not against getting the
>
> occasional 1U 'a few years old but with a fresh warranty' dell for
>
> swiss-army-knife server basic stuff like a dc/dns/ad/dhcp box.
>
>
>
> So sometimes we'll grab something like an R420 poweredge and put a
>
> RAID card in it/drac it and even ESXi it to internal USB bootable for
>
> a few grand less than new (but still with new hd's)
>
>
>
> Just throwing it out there, I know folks sometimes cringe at the 'used'
>
> market but in certain situations it works.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: [email protected]
>
> [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:46 PM
>
> To: ntsysadm <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: [NTSysADM] Server build recommendation
>
>
>
> The owner of a small 5-6 person property management company has
>
> approached me to help acquire a new server. They're currently running
>
> a 10+yo machine with SBS 2003, and wish to replace it.
>
>
>
> They've migrated their email to gmail, so don't need exchange, but do
>
> want a DC for account management, DHCP/DNS, etc., so they're looking
>
> to go with Server Essentials.
>
>
>
> The fellow he's nominated at his firm to be their sysadmin is quite
>
> green, and got a quote from Dell for a tower box with a software RAID
>
> card, and I told them to hold off on that purchase, while I look at
>
> alternatives.
>
>
>
> I was leaning toward an HP Microserver, but haven't played with one in
>
> years, and it looks like the current generation is using an AMD
>
> processor, and doesn't come with a RAID card to support RAID1.
>
>
>
> Anyone have a recommendation they can make regarding hardware?
>
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to