What it looks like is that they are just doing some reactionary legislation. Legislation without planning and considering all options shouldn't be the way we are governed. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Cass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:18 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Senate votes to permit warrantless Net-wiretaps, Carn > > > It seems to me that the senate is just reviving old > legislation and passing > it. There seems to be a complete disconnect from what AG > John Ashcroft is > asking for... > > > Tom Cass > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Wehnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:07 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Senate votes to permit warrantless Net-wiretaps, Carn > > I agree. There are problems with the current laws regarding > wire-taping and > electronic surveillance (ES). But those problems should be > fixed instead of > just removing all regulations in place that protect people. > > I heard today on the news that if the FBI (or whoever) is > using ES against a > foreigner and that guy connects to a US based pc. They have > to immediately > end the surveillance until the suspect disconnects from the > US based PC. If > that's their big problem change that law, don't just make it > so they can spy > on whoever they want at any given moment. > > Matt Wehnes > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:15 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Senate votes to permit warrantless Net-wiretaps, Carn > > > I am a strong supporter of law enforcement but I believe this > amendment goes > too > far. It can be abused by local Private Investigators...do > you really want a > PI > getting a wire tap on your phone/computer? The wording needs to be > clarified > and certain provisions spelled out before this becomes an > acceptable piece > of > legislature. That's all the opposing Senators want, time to > clairfy just > what > will be included in Title III. > > There is no way this amendment could have guaranteed > preventing the WTC > disaster. There is no way it can guarantee preventing a > similar disaster > > tnx Stu > ralph > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > Subject: RE: Senate votes to permit warrantless > Net-wiretaps, Carnivo > Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 09/18/2001 5:50 AM > > Here here! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:53 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Senate votes to permit warrantless Net-wiretaps, > Carnivore > use > > Write my Congressman about what? About implementing laws designed to > protect us at the cost of a minor infringement on my civil > rights? What > are they doing that your employer or network admins, who could use > benign e-mails in a much more malicious manner, don't already > do. While > I don't like it that we have go to these lengths, I feel it's > necessary > for our National Security. Besides, I've nothing to hide and if I had > something to hide I would not be likely to send it via e-mail. Maybe, > just maybe, if we had this in place a while back, some 6,000+ people, > some of which may have even been on this list, would still be with us. > It's a dangerous world out there, which requires unpleasant measures. > GOD BLESS AMERICA. > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
