both
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:24 PM
Subject: RE: Router connection issue


> What type of interface does the Netscreen use?
> Command, Web, ?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:05 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Router connection issue
> 
> 
> One firewall with DMZ & no other equip needed. Netscreen 10 would work.
> Ext interface to router, Int interface to your LAN, DMZ to other LAN.
> This would give you firewall protection between all interfaces plus NAT.
> Around 3k.
> 
> The real problem will be...what to do with the leftover Cisco 1720 & T1.
> Saved enough to pay for the new firewall in 60days.
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Router connection issue
> 
> 
> > The 1720's only support one WIC, so I think your only option is to get
> 
> > a switch (catalyst 2912 comes to mind) where you can set VLANs up and 
> > hang firewalls between the two companies. You get the connectivity 
> > with the protection, but it will not be free.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:37 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Router connection issue
> >
> >
> >
> > Basically, we have two fully functional networks, both with Cisco 1720
> 
> > routers.  We want to keep the networks separate and only want to be 
> > able
> to
> > use a single T-1 instead of separate T-1s.  Both routers and T-1
> connections
> > are in the same wiring closet.  What I would like to do is use some 
> > sort
> of
> > switch for both routers to plug into and from the switch, plug into 
> > the single T-1.  We originally had their network connected to our and 
> > had all sorts of issues between our NT4 servers and their Win2K 
> > servers, which is why they went with a separate router and T-1.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Pat
> >
> > Pat Marshall
> > Systems Administrator
> > Microsoft Certified Professional
> > Flying Rhinoceros
> > 1440 NW Overton Street
> > Portland, OR  97209
> > (503) 552-8700
> > (503) 221-7282 (Fax)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                     Steven.Beckwith@lsa
> >
> >                     -assoc.com                 To:     "NT System
> Admin
> > Issues"
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >                     09/28/01 02:01 PM          cc:
> >
> >                     Please respond to          Subject:     RE: Router
> > connection issue
> >                     "NT System Admin
> >
> >                     Issues"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't know what a white Russian is but it sounds good for a Friday.
> Don't
> > start a whole discussion on it - enough noise already.
> >
> >
> > 1) the T-1 is a digital line that connects to a CSU/DSU (serial
> connection)
> > on your router.  As Jason points out, CSU's can be internal or 
> > external
> and
> > I suspect you have an internal WIC card similar to his set up which is
> 
> > why there may be confusion.
> >
> >
> > Although you may have an RJ-45 connector and a regular patch cord (you
> could
> > actually use a regular phone line), it is NOT an ethernet type 
> > connection, so only one router can host this connection (You could opt
> 
> > for a THIRD router in your solution).
> >
> >
> > 2) you are also going to need to know about how many "real" (outside) 
> > IP addresses you have and whether you intend to "share" them (NAT - 
> > Network address translation) or whether you will "redirect" them (PAT 
> > - Port
> address
> > translation).
> >
> >
> > A few other questions come to mind. Is there any inbound traffic that
> needs
> > to be directed to a specific box (www, smtp) i.e. Do you or the other 
> > company want to have exchange servers or web servers accessible from 
> > the internet (in which case you will need dedicated static outside IP
> addresses
> > for each service) or do you both still get mail via pop3, (in which 
> > case maybe you can get by with NAT).  How many nodes each office, what
> 
> > types of routers are these?
> >
> >
> > I like the idea of sharing resources to keep costs down, but I need to
> 
> > say AMEN to the Firewalling suggestion, esp. to protect your network 
> > from
> theirs
> > and vice versa (as well as obviously - the outside).
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:30 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Router connection issue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:47 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: Router connection issue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Where is the csu/dsu in your layout?  You need one of them to talk 
> > from
> the
> >
> > t1 to the router.  All of my routers were purchased with the WICT1-DSU
> built
> > in so I just terminate there.  If you have an external csu like from
> Adtran
> >
> > you need the cable going from the csu to the router, depending on the 
> > interface.
> >
> >
> > Here's what I would recommend to segment the networks from each other.
> Make
> > sure your router has 2 ethernet ports, set one port up on their 
> > network
> and
> >
> > the other on your network.  Setup a loopback port and route anything 
> > going from network A to network B to that loopback and vice versa, but
> 
> > anything going to and from the Internet would be routed properly.
> >
> >
> > Also....it's really really really necessary to setup some sort of
> firewall.
> >
> > Perhaps that's where you can do your routing from network to internet.
> Setup
> > a Linux box with 3 NICs, 1 for each network and 1 for the internet 
> > router. Setup the firewalling and away you go.
> >
> >
> > If you need more help, feel free to contact me directly. Jason Morris 
> > CCDA CCNP Network Administrator
> > MJMC, Inc.
> > 708-225-2350
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:30 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Router connection issue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> >
> > I've been a lurker for quite a while (learning bunches), but now I 
> > have a problem that totally confounds me.
> >
> >
> > There are two companies in the building where I work.  Each company 
> > has a separate network connected through a separate Cisco router to a 
> > T-1.  For financial reasons, the two companies have agreed to share a 
> > single T-1.
> What
> > I would like to do is have a switch  that both routers plug into, and
> which
> > then uplinks to the single T-1.  We do not want to co-mingle the 
> > networks. According to Cisco's documentation, it is a straight-through
> 
> > cable from
> the
> > router to the T-1.  If I connect the switch or a hub between
> >
> > our router and its T-1, I get an alarm on the router and no connection
> 
> > lights on the switch/hub.  I've also tried using a crossover cable 
> > with
> the
> >
> > same effect and have tried using/not using the uplink port on the 
> > switch/hub.  Have also tried restarting the router between connection 
> > changes.  What am I missing?  I'm ready to give up and head to the 
> > nearest bar for a pitcher of White Russians.
> >
> >
> > TIA,
> > Pat
> >
> >
> > Pat Marshall
> > Systems Administrator
> > Microsoft Certified Professional
> > Flying Rhinoceros
> > 1440 NW Overton Street
> > Portland, OR  97209
> > (503) 552-8700
> > (503) 221-7282 (Fax)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> > Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> > Confidential:  This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the 
> > property of Lanco International and/or its affiliates, are 
> > confidential,
> and
> > are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
> > this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s)
> 
> > or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this 
> > message in error, please notify the sender at the above e-mail address
> 
> > and delete
> this
> >
> > message immediately from your computer.  Any other use, retention, 
> > dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is 
> > strictly prohibited.
> >
> >
> > Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> > Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> >
> >
> > Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> > Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> > Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> >
> > Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> > Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
> > http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> 
> 
> Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> 
> 
> Want to unsub? Do that here:
> http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
> http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Reply via email to