Well, maybe so. I've never had any problems with the OST's on my whole-disk 
encrypted TrueCrypt systems. But I don't use PGP so maybe there's something 
special going on there. Then again I've been supporting Outlook/Exchange for 
the better part of 16 years and I can't recall ever hearing of a known issue 
with PGP disk encryption. <shrug>

What version of Outlook are you using?

Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
______________________________________________
Roland Schorr & Tower
www.rolandschorr.com<http://www.rolandschorr.com/>

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 9:23
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outsourcing Exchange

We have a winner. Apparently the .OST's get easily corrupted on machines that 
have PGP and calendaring meetings, etc, goes haywire [1]

[1]Haywire defined as it's on my calendar and not yours, or when I modify it I 
see both versions (or maybe just the latest, sometimes) but yours only sees one 
and it may or may not be the correct revision. Or maybe you'll get a meeting 
conflict notice, complaining essentially about seeing itself twice, and 
choosing "fix it" removes both instances.

From: Ben M. Schorr 
[mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 9:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outsourcing Exchange

Seems unlikely to me, but without knowing the nature of the issues it's hard to 
say.  Are they Outlook issues?  Does the vendor think the encryption is 
interfering with cached Exchange mode?

Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
______________________________________________
Roland Schorr & Tower
www.rolandschorr.com<http://www.rolandschorr.com/>

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 9:03
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Outsourcing Exchange

Our outsourcing vendor has identified PGP's Whole Disk Encryption as a major 
contributing factor to some major issues we're having so we're starting to 
remove it permanently from several users' machines to make the outsourced work 
and "we need to find a suitable workaround for those systems".

This strikes me as insane. Comments?
David Lum
Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to