Here's power savings for you.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20128509-92/powered-by-arm-chip-calxeda-server-sips-5-watts/?tag=nl.e724
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How much processing power do you need? (WAS: So, my Mac Mini 
server arrived today...)

I've run Win2k3 Server on a dual-core Atom. Mostly just file serving. Runs 
fine. SuperMicro makes some server class Atom systems, so it's not a crazy 
idea. Just depends on what you need to do, how much you want to spend, and how 
much headroom you want for future needs.

There are limitations, though. First, you're sacrificing a lot in clock speed 
over most desktop or server class processorts. You're limited to 4GB of RAM, 
with no support for ECC. Unless it's a purpose-build server motherboard, you're 
limited to two SATA devices. Virtually all motherboards, including those from 
SuperMicro, are mini-ITX form factor, so you generally have just one PCI-E slot.

Small size and low power usage are usually the biggest reasons to use an Atom 
(or AMD Fusion) solution as a server. Makes a nice little application server 
(such as a music server) for the home that can be tucked away almost anywhere.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew W. Ross" <[email protected]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:46 PM
Subject: How much processing power do you need? (WAS: So, my Mac Mini server 
arrived today...)


So, since this has come up, I'm curious on how much processing power is 
actually needed for most services?

I have some Quad-Core Xeons which are absolutely underutilized. They are doing 
their jobs (usually serving user home folders and standard Active Directory 
duties) with plenty of horsepower to spare. So it makes me
wonder: Has anybody tried Windows Server on an Atom?

Take all the other bottlenecks out of the equation: Plenty of RAM, fast HD or 
SSD... does the 1.8 dual core Atom (or the Socket 1155 Celeron) handle most 
tasks just as well as a Dual 6Core Xeon? Aka, could I be getting away with less 
expensive hardware to do the same duties?

I realize if I'm encoding or rendering, the hefty Xeon is a much better bet. Or 
if I'm trying to run VMs, the Atom's not even an option.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to