I think we need more details to of the scheduled job as well as what the task does that might be different under a scheduler vs interactively.
* * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Paul Hutchings <[email protected]>wrote: > We have a task (not one of mine so not sure entirely what it is/does > that, when run interactively takes a certain amount of time to complete.** > ** > > ** ** > > The same task when run via a scheduled task, takes much longer to > complete. Apparently it’s entirely reproducible and along the lines of a > batch file being run.**** > > ** ** > > Any ideas why this might be assuming the info I’m being given is accurate > and it’s the exact same command/script is being called via the schedule > task?**** > > ** ** > > The OS is 2008 R2 SP1.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Paul**** > ------------------------------ > *MIRA Ltd* > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
