Why did you choose Netapp?  I'm looking to budget for a replacement SAN in the 
next or so.  Currently, we're using a EMC CX500.
We're also looking into VDI, which would necessitate a new SAN due to my CX500 
basically being maxed out on drives.  I've got a price on an EMC VNX5300 but 
the consultant said he could also price out a Netapp.  (I've also heard some 
good things about Dell's Compellent line.)

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization

I'm just in the middle up upgrading from an 4 year old HP EVA 4000 to an $130k 
NetApp solution, this includes 2 new DL380 G7 192 GB of ram dual X5650 
processors and yes no HD's just SD for the VMware. AI also got 2 NetApp shelves 
FAS-2240 production with 24 * 600GB Drives and the DR with 24 * 1Tb drives and 
an HP Tape loader including installation and setup services but I'm re-using my 
fibe switches and also re-using older ML370 for my DR. DE duplication has 
already given me back 1.3Tb and counting.

I'm very impressed.

Stefan

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, David Mazzaccaro 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:
I am still researching and meeting w/ vendors.
One thing that has just come up w/ a particular vendor.
They are telling me that they would put in 3 hosts, w/ no hard drives and that 
VMware would run off a USB stick???
This sounds pretty cheesy to me... is this common practice?
What are the pros/cons to USB stick vs a pair of mirrored drives on the hosts?



From: Paul Hutchings 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization

The reality here is that you're not going to spend $130k on a virtualisation 
solution and not want to add more VM's,

Honestly, just add DataCenter from the get-go - you'll make use of it I 
guarantee it.

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 15 March 2012 14:03
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization

I admit it was a while back, it may have changed, or my understanding was 
incorrect.  Or someone told me that and I read it that way.  In any event, I 
think 12 total servers for his environment may be a bit low...  Or it may not 
be.  With Datacenter licensing, if he loses a host, he can move the guests to 
the other machines and do some back of the hand guestimate based on load 
balancing not licensing.



On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Ken Schaefer 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No this is incorrect. Check the Microsoft Windows Server licensing guide:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/0/D/9/0D9DDF52-A855-487B-9B74-5A09A9389551/Windows%20Server%20System%20Center%20and%20Forefront%20Pricing%20and%20Licensing%20Guide.pdf

You can move individual VOSE licenses between Enterprise Hosts, provided that 
no host ends up exceeding the 1 POSE + 4 VOSE limit per enterprise license. For 
more than 4 VOSEs on a physical host, you need 2 (or more) enterprise licenses.

Check out page 8 on the document above - has this exact example in a diagram.

Cheers
Ken

From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2012 1:24 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization

It's even a more (unenforcebly) stringent than that.  If you run 4 VMs on 3 
hosts with enterprise server on each host, you power down two and do a switch, 
you're in a licensing violation situation.  Technically, you have to move all 3 
from one host to another.  So single licensing or Datacenter, or some oddball 
combination of single licenses and enterprise licenses (DAMHIKT).

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that's the way I read the license.  And I 
prefer to play it straight/conservative.  I'll look forward to your response in 
about 4-6 hours.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Miller Bonnie L. 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And I'm not familiar with the HP hardware, so it's very possible they can-I 
just didn't see anything about clustering in the original post.

Why it's important is one thing MS had told us is if you are planning on 
clustering, in an environment like this, you are out of compliance with 
licensing as soon as you migrate the 5th VM over to a server that is only 
running Enterprise edition (such as to down one of the 3 servers for patching). 
 That is of course, unless you own separate individual server licenses for 
those VMs.

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:50 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization

I have VM hosts at home that can support 6-8 hosts easily.

At the office, we have hosts that can support 15-20 VMs pretty easily.  Of 
course, this depends on the workload of the boxes, but for all but the most 
extreme workloads, this is probably doable.

If you build each host to support 30-40% more VMs than normal, then you can 
suffer a failure of one of them without great difficulty.
ASB

http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker

Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Miller Bonnie L. 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't see any mention of failover clustering.  Right now, how much do you 
lose if one server is down?  How much would you lose if 4 servers were down 
instead?

Just a thought, but you could add another host server, or stick with three, run 
datacenter, and build them with enough guts to run 6 VMs each.  That also gives 
you the ability to spin up test servers, etc, as you mentioned.

From: David Mazzaccaro 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:04 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: New to virtualization


Hi all,

I am starting to investigate moving our aging network infrastructure into the 
virtual world.

~ 10 servers, 6-7 years old

Windows 2003 domain

Exchange 2003

Citrix 4.0 farm

~190 users

After some initial discussions w/ a reseller, here's what they are recommending:

(3) DL 380 G7 servers (to host the VMs) ~$18,000

(1) Net App FAS2240 (this is the SAN that would host 12 600GB drives of storage 
for the VMs) ~$20,000

VMWare essentials plus kit (VMware software) ~$5200

(3) MS Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise (this would allow the 3 HP servers to run 4 
Windows 2008 VMs each)

I guess the way it would work is that the VMs would reside on the SAN, and the 
3 hosts would call up the SAN to load each VM utilizing the host's CPU, RAM, 
NIC, etc.)... right?

I have meetings scheduled w/ 2 other vendors, but verbally both have started 
the conversation along the same path as above.

Being very new to VM, does the above scenario seem to make sense?

It is hard for me to imagine all that traffic going between the SAN and the 
host servers w/o creating a huge bottleneck (over gig Ethernet)

Do people recommend virtualizing every server?

Domain controllers? Exchange? Citrix farm (4 server)?

Shouldn't something be left physical?

Is 7 TB of storage enough (probably only 3 usable after array config)?

Is the net app a decent appliance? $20k sounds cheap to me...

I have done a little more reading, and from what I understand w/ 3 Windows 
Enterprise licenses, I would be limiting myself to 12 VMs.

However, if I went w/ 3 Windows Datacenter licenses, for a small increase in 
price - I would get unlimited VMs?

Which would allow for actually having a testing environment, and better patch 
deployment?

Thx


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

________________________________
MIRA Ltd

Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England
Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
VAT Registration  GB 100 1464 84

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the 
intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and 
notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to