I would just expand that Kurt can still meet his 5 year retention policy. It 
will just be there in one 'blob' of bits. The original copy and then all the 
'incremental' changes. It will, in my opinion work much better in that 
scenario. No thinking about what tape is at what storage site.  Just hit the 
spiffy calendar in DPM and pick the document and pull it back.

So if offsite storage is needed, set up a second one and replicate it off 
site/cloud.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS DPM Opinions

That's not the way it works. :-P

DPM originally makes a bit-for-bit copy of the "thing" to be backed up. After 
that, only changed blocks are backed up. That's on disk. Generally, I see 50-60 
generations of files being kept by clients.

You can do a tape dump of the full image but that's not really the way DPM is 
designed to work. It takes a slightly different perspective than traditional 
backup products.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: MS DPM Opinions

To further this conversation - what multiple of disk space does DPM have 
available vs. the disk consumed in production, and what kind of history do you 
keep?

We're contemplating moving from Ultrabac and a tape robot to DPM, and are 
currently doing a standard Grandparent/Parent/Child tape rotation with a 5 year 
retention for the archive.

Kurt

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:26, Bob Fronk <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have been using DPM for about two years now.  No complaints.  I do 
> not use removable media, so I cannot comment on those posts.  (I use a 
> secondary DPM server at another geographic site to assure offsite 
> backup of the primary DPM server)
>
>
>
> If you have specific questions, you know a couple ways to contact me J
>
>
>
> BF
>
>
>
>
>
> From: James Kerr [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:33 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: MS DPM Opinions
>
>
>
> Heh, any of you guys have any opinions good or bad about DPM? Any 
> gotchas I should know about, etc? I'm ordering a server today to be 
> the backup repository for the VMs and physical machines that DPM will be 
> backing up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to