If you don't need SBS, don't buy SBS. Last time I priced SBS, it was more expensive than just Windows Server. So, buying Windows Server, assuming it meets all your needs seems like it would be the automatic choice.
Unless I'm missing something here. ??? On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jimmy Tran <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m getting ready to purchase a few licenses for a client. The main > difference I see between the two OS’s is SBS includes Exchange. The down > side is SBS requires much more resources as seen from my lab. If there are > no plans for on premise exchange, should I be going with Server 2008 R2?** > ** > > ** ** > > Thanks in advance for your suggestions.**** > > ** ** > > Jimmy**** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
