It really depends on what the users are trying to accomplish. People use the term 'wiki' and they often have a whole set of assumptions that they never actually discuss.
What they are looking to accomplish with the tool is the more interesting question then does X wiki product work better then Y wiki product. X May not have the specific feature implemented the originator is actually imaganing a use for. Steven Peck On Feb 11, 2008 2:44 PM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 11, 2008 5:38 PM, Michael B. Smith > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I'm outside of my "comfort zone" here. > > Likewise, from the other direction -- I've logged a lot of time on > MediaWiki- and TWiki-based wikis, but really have none with the WSS > stuff. > > And don't get me wrong, the WSS demos I've seen make it look pretty > impressive, especially for the MS Office family. I just think the the > WSS "wiki" label is more about marketing than actually being like > other wikis. Better to advocate WSS on its own merits. Indeed, it > may be that WSS, and not a wiki-clone, is more suited to what the OP > is looking for... > > > -- Ben > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
