You should create this on your own to be certain you have these very
important settings configured properly.

Modify the registry on a test system.  Verify that it is working
appropriately by testing WU/AU on it.  If you are successful in
blocking the update, export the registry settings to a .REG file and
use the REG2ADM.EXE utility to convert the settings into a .ADM
administrative template file.


On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Miguel Gonzalez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. Is there any adm template that
>  I can use for not creating this from scratch?
>
>  Thanks,
>
>
>
>  Miguel
>
>
>  --- Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  escribió:
>
>  > you certainly will need administrative privs to
>  > modify this setting.
>  > it is the same setting that the tool that Sam
>  > referenced modifies.
>  >
>  > On 5/12/08, Miguel Gonzalez
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > Do I need admin permissions to add this registry
>  > entry
>  > > when run from the logon script or any user could
>  > add
>  > > it?
>  > >
>  > > Miguel
>  > >
>  > > --- Micheal Espinola Jr
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > escribió:
>  > >
>  > > > Yes, via a registry hack:
>  > > >
>  > > > Registry location:
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  >
>  HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate
>  > > >
>  > > > Key DWORD value name:
>  > > >
>  > > >   DoNotAllowSP
>  > > >
>  > > > Values:
>  > > >
>  > > >   1 = WU/MU/AU delivery is disabled
>  > > >   anything else =  delivery is enabled
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Miguel Gonzalez
>  > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > > > Is there any way to control in the GPO that
>  > > > service
>  > > > >  packs are not downloaded automatically in the
>  > > > domain
>  > > > >  machines?
>  > > > >
>  > > > >  I want to have the flexibility that minor
>  > updates
>  > > > are
>  > > > >  installed but not service packs
>  > > > >
>  > > > >  Is that possible?
>  > > > >
>  > > > >  Miguel
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > >  --- David L Herrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > > >  escribió:
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > >  > Clean on the first dozen machines
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > David
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>
> > > > >  > From: Joe Heaton
>  > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > >  > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:18 AM
>
> > > > >
>  > > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > Subject: RE: WinXpSP3 from Windows Updates
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Has anyone seen issues with SP3 coming
>  > through
>  > > > WSUS?
>  > > > >  >  I have it listed
>  > > > >  > there now, but the approval is Detect Only
>  > at
>  > > > the
>  > > > >  > moment.  Would like to
>  > > > >  > know how that avenue went/is going for some
>  > > > others
>  > > > >  > before I approve the
>  > > > >  > update.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Thanks,
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Joe Heaton
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>
> > > > >  > ________________________________
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > From: David W. McSpadden
>  > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > >  > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 5:14 AM
>
> > > > >
>  > > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>
>
> > > > > > Subject: WinXpSP3 from Windows Updates
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Had a couple family members call last night
>  > > > about
>  > > > >  > SP3 killing their
>  > > > >  > machines.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > They use Windows Updates nightly and when
>  > they
>  > > > >  > rebooted their machine it
>  > > > >  > wouldn't come up.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > After many SafeMode boots I called
>  > TechSupport
>  > > > and
>  > > > >  > they told me there is
>  > > > >  > an issue with the WindowsUpdate
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > version of SP3 and to have it blocked from
>  > > > being
>  > > > >  > downloaded on any other
>  > > > >  > machine until it is resolved.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > They seemed to know all about it because
>  > they
>  > > > >  > stepped me through the
>  > > > >  > correct SafeMode fix for it.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Didn't know what anybody else knew.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Good night.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > IT works,
>  > > > >  > but keeping IT working is the hard part.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  > Automation is great,
>  > > > >  > until it breaks.
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>  > > > >  >
>
> > > > >  > This email and any attached files are
>  > > > confidential
>  > > > >  > and intended solely for the intended
>  > > > recipient(s).
>  > > > >  > If you are not the named recipient you
>  > should
>  > > > not
>  > > > >  > read, distribute, copy or alter this email.
>  > Any
>  > > > >  > views or opinions expressed in this email
>  > are
>  > > > those
>  > > > >  > of the author and do not represent those of
>
> > the
>  > > > >  > Names in the News company. Warning:
>  > Although
>  >
>
>
> === message truncated ===
>
>
>
>       ______________________________________________
>  Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente.
>
>
>  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
>  ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
>



-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to