The compatibility for the LOB app might be a stumbling block. While they
don't "officially" support doing it that way, there are enough other people
that are doing it without trouble. The company offers the next step up
version that will do the remote access part but needs SQL Server. So the
pricing down the road will need to be considered.

I know I need to check on Citrix. Going to do some research there after
getting some basic figures together.

Thanks.

Art DeKneef
Avanti Computers
Mesa, AZ
480-649-4430

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 3:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Allowing virtual employees access through Terminal Services

a) Check application compatibility #1: not everything plays nicely with
terminal services, and some applications explicitly forbid installation
on servers in general.

b) Check application compatibility #2: not everything place nicely with
Server 2008. General rule of thumb: if it doesn't work with Vista it
won't work with Server 2008.

c) With the number of users you're talking about you Really Really want
to look at adding Citrix to the mix. If it was never going to go above
25 users my advice would be to not bother. For demonstration purposes
you can probably do without it.

Art DeKneef wrote:
> The idea is to start small and see what happens and proceed from there.
> I can figure out pricing and the server cost. What I am looking for are
> any tips or things to look out for while still in the planning stages
> from those that have done or are doing something similar.
> 
> I have been reading up on Terminal Services in Server 2008 right now and
> looking at the guidelines but was hoping for some insight.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to