What do you mean? That's an extra grand in your pocket that Cisco doesn't get...LOL.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Adam Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My fears exactly ... customer saves $1000 by buying Netgear, experiences > service interruptions, then spends $1000 hiring me to fix things over the > course of a year when things go down. Don't want to go there! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:18 PM > *Subject:* RE: etherchannel compatibility > > I would replace the Netgear with Cisco. I realize etherchannel is layer > 2 but dude, its netgear and to quote Mr. Ely, it "sucks donkey balls" > > > > MHOO, > > > > Shook > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Adam Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:15 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* etherchannel compatibility > > > > Hi guys, > > > > Need to bond some fiber lines ... Anyone have experience getting > Etherchannel to work between Cisco (3560G) and Netgear (GSM7224)? > > > > Not sure if I should even try, or if I should just replace the Netgear with > a Cisco ... > > > > Thanks, > > Adam > > > > > > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
