Actually I've had pretty good luck with their high end stuff. Of course most of my customers are 50 seats or less. And the one customer I have that is using fiber is Netgear to Netgear.
From: Adam Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: etherchannel compatibility My fears exactly ... customer saves $1000 by buying Netgear, experiences service interruptions, then spends $1000 hiring me to fix things over the course of a year when things go down. Don't want to go there! ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Shook <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: NT System Admin Issues <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:18 PM Subject: RE: etherchannel compatibility I would replace the Netgear with Cisco. I realize etherchannel is layer 2 but dude, its netgear and to quote Mr. Ely, it "sucks donkey balls" MHOO, Shook _____ From: Adam Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: etherchannel compatibility Hi guys, Need to bond some fiber lines ... Anyone have experience getting Etherchannel to work between Cisco (3560G) and Netgear (GSM7224)? Not sure if I should even try, or if I should just replace the Netgear with a Cisco ... Thanks, Adam ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
