This statement implies that bugs we not uncovered. Or did you mean "all"
bugs should have been uncovered? Either way it seems a tad unrealistic.
 
-- 
Mike Gill


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:30 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Code execution vulnerability found in Firefox 3.0
> 
> And, it is.
> 
> Still, the foundation of "many eyes" is supposed to help uncover bugs
> and
> provide more secure applications.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:10 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Code execution vulnerability found in Firefox 3.0
> 
> The same could be said for anything.
> 
> --
> Mike Gill
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:59 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Code execution vulnerability found in Firefox 3.0
> >
> > With all those eyes looking at the code, you would have thought
> someone
> > would have seen it before now.



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to