It's in Perfmon - you can get real-time numbers. Use the "report" view, not the "graphical" view.
Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Increasing Sockets Does that show anywhere on the tcp view? I think the overall problem is voice is running through here and its all udp traffic, and its obvious the call quality is poor due to packet loss but im trying to find *where* that is occurring. Im going to run tcpview on the other side too and see if anything stands out. _____ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Increasing Sockets That plus dropped UDP packets on both ends (which should be less than 1%) should be sufficient to prove that it isn't the issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Increasing Sockets Im running tcpview, its showing me 368 endpoints on the ISA server, seems a far cry from the 40k default set in the tcp stack of Windows. _____ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Increasing Sockets Take a look at tcpview from sysinternals. >From Perfmon, look at the UDPv4 performance object. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Increasing Sockets That's the thing, Im not sure where to count that, Im looking for some tools now to verify. Its 99% udp traffic (voip) and the pbx guys are telling me its straight up packet loss most likely due to windows sockets. I suppose I could flip to a linux type firewall/vpn or I could just raise the sockets limit, Im just not sure where to gather the right data to see if Im hitting any limits. I already set ISA to not have any connection limits and not inspect any packets or do anything like that thinking that could be the case but apparently that has had no result. Our bandwidth is good, I have Solarwinds running on my 6meg pipe on both sides and there is no real errors and usage is peaked at @ 65%. I never hit full throughput. _____ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Increasing Sockets How many sockets do you have in use? The only place where I've needed to do this in the past was on VERY busy web servers and RPC/HTTP servers (a special case of a web server). Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Increasing Sockets Im using 2 ISA servers for a temporary connection to a SIP based PBX system, the vendor is telling me they think that I need to increase the sockets on Windows because the udp packets are getting dropped. The servers are ISA on each side and connected by a 6meg bonded pipe pending a 100meg fiber link to the hosting facility. Anyone think this is rubbish or have any experience with something like this? I know I can increase the sockets pretty easily, I know ISA doesn't have any QoS to handle the traffic correctly but when I told the vendor what I was going to do for them they didn't seem to have a problem with it until the calls came up real choppy. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
