yes
GuidoElia
HELPPC
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: lunedì 7 luglio 2008 17.59
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Remote Location AD Question
Do you use DHCP relay on your remote site's routers?
-----Original Message-----
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Remote Location AD Question
Dhcp from central site and MPLS through HDSL
GuidoElia
HELPPC
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: lunedì 7 luglio 2008 17.46
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Remote Location AD Question
What do you guys use for IP assignment? We have 3 remote offices, each with
less than 15 users, that I'd love to get to a point of not having a DC there.
Do you have member server in place for files, etc? Or do you have everything
going over the wire to your central site?
Joe Heaton
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Remote Location AD Question
You definitely want those workstations joined to the domain. GPO for
management, Anti-virus updates, patch management, reporting/inventory of the
systems, remoting in for troubleshooting etc. Logon traffic for 50
workstations across a t1 is negligible as long as latency is low.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:14 AM, David Mazzaccaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't use RDP, but rather ICA (Citrix) and it works great - all
> their apps are available.
> As for locking down - we use GPOs rather than locking them down
> individually.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: N Parr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:53 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Remote Location AD Question
>
> Thanks, I guess I won't worry about it for now. It's just a shipping
> warehouse at the moment and I'll be ok as long as they don't decide to
> put office staff at the location.
> ________________________________
> From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 8:37 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Remote Location AD Question
>
> I have a remote location w/ 30 workstations and IP phones, no remote
> DC, connected over a MPLS VPN T1 circuit.
>
> Works great! Less filling!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: N Parr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:23 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Remote Location AD Question
>
>
>
> How many member workstations would you put at a remote location
> connected with a Site to Site VPN over a T-1 without a local DC? Only
> other traffic on the line will be an IP phone, random print jobs and
> RDP sessions from remote workstations. What I'm thinking is since
> these remote workstations will run everything over their RDP sessions
> I shouldn't even bother making them domain members. Just lock them
down and only allow them access to RDP.
>
> Thanks
>
> Niles
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
