The end of the article was concise. If you have a mixed 2000/XP/2003 and Vista/2008 you will need both the ADM and ADMX formats. Once you get rid of the 2000 et.al. machines you can then do the ADMX only but until then you are stuck.
Jon On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, John Hornbuckle < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've found that if I have a policy that uses both ADM and ADMX files, I > can edit the ADM components of the policy from XP/2003. But to work on the > ADMX components, I have to use Vista. > > > > Migrating to ADMX did not stop our ADM-based policies from working. I never > ran the tool to try converting ADM to ADMX. > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:33 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: ADM and ADMX on a 2003 domain > > > > I missed that message. You appear to be right though. I am still doing my > research but I still can not find out if I edit an existing GPO after > creating the Central Store and populating it what happens. This is one of > several issues I have to look at before rolling out Server 2008 AD. I also > need to look at DNS, Trusts, and DHCP. I would hate to have to re key my > DHCP but then I have not even started that research. I know I could migrate > 2003 DHCP from and to another 2003 server but can I do it to 2008? DNS is > going to be fun as well with support for IP6 in it and what issues will that > create. I have several trusts that took a long time to create and work > perfectly now but when I move to 2008 will this kill the trusts? As you can > see I have a lot to research and I am fighting to get it all done before an > unreliable machine finally fails. > > > > Jon > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:22 AM, John Hornbuckle < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had posted a question about ADMX files here yesterday. Not one response > from the group, which is very unusual. Best I can figure, not too many here > are using ADMX files yet. Otherwise I'm pretty sure a few people would've > spoken up. > > > > > > > > John Hornbuckle > > MIS Department > > Taylor County School District > > 318 North Clark Street > > Perry, FL 32347 > > > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > > > > > > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:01 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* ADM and ADMX on a 2003 domain > > > > Sorry for the cross post but the Active Directory list is not as active as > the NT Sys Admin list. > > > > Has anyone updated/installed/deployed the new ADMX format GPO's yet? It > appears that once you upgrade the domain to use the new format it can only > be managed from a Vista or Windows 2008 machine. What happens to all of the > existing GPO's do they get converted or are they left alone? I did find the > ADMX migrator but I am not talking about using it at the moment. There > appears to be a one way switch in the Group Policy Mangement mmc that > creates the starter GPO's in the ADMX format. The reading I have done > indicates that once I create these starter GPO's all new GPO's can 1. only > be managed from a Vista or 2008 GPMC and 2. will be in the new ADMX format. > > > > I would like to know from some of you if you have done this and 1. what > happened to the existing GPO's and 2. if you open and edit an existing GPO > does it get converted to the new format? > > > > Thanks for any insight you can offer, > > > > Jon > > > > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
