So are mine so I will be leaving them alone and not worrying about getting
rid of the ADM's for now.

Jon

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM, John Hornbuckle <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Our client machines are all XP/Vista, and servers are all 2003/2008.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:41 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ADM and ADMX on a 2003 domain
>
>
>
> The end of the article was concise.  If you have a mixed 2000/XP/2003 and
> Vista/2008 you will need both the ADM and ADMX formats.  Once you get rid of
> the 2000 et.al. machines you can then do the ADMX only but until then you
> are stuck.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, John Hornbuckle <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've found that if I have a policy that uses both ADM and ADMX files, I can
> edit the ADM components of the policy from XP/2003. But to work on the ADMX
> components, I have to use Vista.
>
>
>
> Migrating to ADMX did not stop our ADM-based policies from working. I never
> ran the tool to try converting ADM to ADMX.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:33 AM
>
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>
> *Subject:* Re: ADM and ADMX on a 2003 domain
>
>
>
> I missed that message.  You appear to be right though.  I am still doing my
> research but I still can not find out if I edit an existing GPO after
> creating the Central Store and populating it what happens.  This is one of
> several issues I have to look at before rolling out Server 2008 AD.  I also
> need to look at DNS, Trusts, and DHCP.  I would hate to have to re key my
> DHCP but then I have not even started that research.  I know I could migrate
> 2003 DHCP from and to another 2003 server but can I do it to 2008?  DNS is
> going to be fun as well with support for IP6 in it and what issues will that
> create.  I have several trusts that took a long time to create and work
> perfectly now but when I move to 2008 will this kill the trusts?  As you can
> see I have a lot to research and I am fighting to get it all done before an
> unreliable machine finally fails.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:22 AM, John Hornbuckle <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had posted a question about ADMX files here yesterday. Not one response
> from the group, which is very unusual. Best I can figure, not too many here
> are using ADMX files yet. Otherwise I'm pretty sure a few people would've
> spoken up.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Hornbuckle
>
> MIS Department
>
> Taylor County School District
>
> 318 North Clark Street
>
> Perry, FL 32347
>
>
>
> www.taylor.k12.fl.us
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:01 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* ADM and ADMX on a 2003 domain
>
>
>
> Sorry for the cross post but the Active Directory list is not as active as
> the NT Sys Admin list.
>
>
>
> Has anyone updated/installed/deployed the new ADMX format GPO's yet?  It
> appears that once you upgrade the domain to use the new format it can only
> be managed from a Vista or Windows 2008 machine.  What happens to all of the
> existing GPO's do they get converted or are they left alone?  I did find the
> ADMX migrator but I am not talking about using it at the moment.  There
> appears to be a one way switch in the Group Policy Mangement mmc that
> creates the starter GPO's in the ADMX format.  The reading I have done
> indicates that once I create these starter GPO's all new GPO's can 1. only
> be managed from a Vista or 2008 GPMC and 2. will be in the new ADMX format.
>
>
>
> I would like to know from some of you if you have done this and 1. what
> happened to the existing GPO's and 2. if you open and edit an existing GPO
> does it get converted to the new format?
>
>
>
> Thanks for any insight you can offer,
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to