You can customise all the options to not do an initial scan and in our
case not use the firewall components. There is a document for SBS
networks which provides a light touch of management - that might be all
you need to protect the clients and it will also give you a good idea of
how to slim down the install package. Skip the basic v11 and go straight
to the latest version - since that upgrade my internal server is now
stable. The AD integration looks seems to work well (small network
experience only though).

 

Mike

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 July 2008 21:44
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection

 

So I guess what I'm really asking here, now that I'm not trying to bash
Symantec, is this:

 

Are there enough improvements with the new version (mainly overhead,
bloat, etc.) to recommend upgrading to it?  My users' main complaint is
that their computer takes sooooo long to completely boot up in the
morning, and this is because Symantec is doing a startup scan and takes
a huge portion of CPU cycles, which bogs down the entire system.  I
personally would love to tell them not to upgrade, but wait until the
contract ends, and dump Symantec like a hot potato.  But I do like that
we have the one brand for both desktop AV and Exchange AV, and would
like to keep it that way.

 

Joe Heaton

________________________________

From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection

 

I liked the product, it's just that at launch it was too heavy to run on
anything but a dedicated box. As all our clients have SBS we just
renewed and kept them on v.10. The new version is a lot lighter, but I'm
still nervous about older servers and we are looking at a more blended
defence. I'll probably keep renewing my clients for one more year and
then see.

 

Mike 

 

From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 July 2008 19:11
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection

 

I have v11.. and the latest greatest rendition, MP2 MR1.. fantastic.. 

But for email servers, id use trend micro's scanmail. IMHO.

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec Endpoint Protection

 

Anyone using this that is happy with it?  Also, is there anyone here
that doesn't think Symantec is a big pile?  I personally hate the
product, and wish that I made the decisions around here, but I don't, so
I have to come up with objective reviews of SEP, and whether or not we
should upgrade from v.10 to the Symantec Mulit-tier protection system,
with SEP, SAV Mobile and Mail Security.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG -
http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1577 -
Release Date: 7/28/2008 6:55 AM


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to