whilst I am no fan of SEP, I have been forced to use it. It extended our
logoff times drastically until I went for the "only Antivirus and
Antispyware" option which seems a lot better. I would still rather use
something different though. I use the AppSense Application Manager component
which blocks any executable from processing that is not on my whitelist, so
i am not too concerned about having all the extra features such as firewall,
network threat protection, application control and intrusion detection that
Symantec tries to push on me. However I have to admit that for standard
virus protection - which is all I want - it seems to be doing exactly what
is required.

Cheers,


2008/7/28 Michael Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>  You can customise all the options to not do an initial scan and in our
> case not use the firewall components. There is a document for SBS networks
> which provides a light touch of management – that might be all you need to
> protect the clients and it will also give you a good idea of how to slim
> down the install package. Skip the basic v11 and go straight to the latest
> version – since that upgrade my internal server is now stable. The AD
> integration looks seems to work well (small network experience only though).
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 28 July 2008 21:44
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> So I guess what I'm really asking here, now that I'm not trying to bash
> Symantec, is this:
>
>
>
> Are there enough improvements with the new version (mainly overhead, bloat,
> etc.) to recommend upgrading to it?  My users' main complaint is that their
> computer takes sooooo long to completely boot up in the morning, and this is
> because Symantec is doing a startup scan and takes a huge portion of CPU
> cycles, which bogs down the entire system.  I personally would love to tell
> them not to upgrade, but wait until the contract ends, and dump Symantec
> like a hot potato.  But I do like that we have the one brand for both
> desktop AV and Exchange AV, and would like to keep it that way.
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Michael Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 28, 2008 11:56 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> I liked the product, it's just that at launch it was too heavy to run on
> anything but a dedicated box. As all our clients have SBS we just renewed
> and kept them on v.10. The new version is a lot lighter, but I'm still
> nervous about older servers and we are looking at a more blended defence.
> I'll probably keep renewing my clients for one more year and then see.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 28 July 2008 19:11
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> I have v11.. and the latest greatest rendition, MP2 MR1.. fantastic..
>
> But for email servers, id use trend micro's scanmail. IMHO.
>
>
>
> *From:* Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 28, 2008 12:34 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> Anyone using this that is happy with it?  Also, is there anyone here that
> doesn't think Symantec is a big pile?  I personally hate the product, and
> wish that I made the decisions around here, but I don't, so I have to come
> up with objective reviews of SEP, and whether or not we should upgrade from
> v.10 to the Symantec Mulit-tier protection system, with SEP, SAV Mobile and
> Mail Security.
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> AISA
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
> 1100 J Street, 4th Floor
>
> Sacramento, CA  95814
>
> (916) 327-5276
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG -
> http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1577 -
> Release Date: 7/28/2008 6:55 AM
>
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to