I've seen that discussed elsewhere. That's standard Google stuff. I believe Google's Orcut has the same verbiage in its EULA. Of course, MS did something similar a while back and the masses went ballistic. MS changed the EULA overnight.
-----Original Message----- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: What no chrome? Anyone read the EULA? Looks like if upload my photos with it to Flickr Google gets to use them however they want, although they are kind enough to let me keep my copyrights. 11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services. > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Benjamin Zachary > I was surprised no one talked about chrome yesterday. > Not too bad, although not sure if the world needs another browser ;) ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
