I don't believe they require ALL of the rights that they are demanding
in order to simply display my content in my browser. As it reads, Google
(in order to promote the 'Service' (read: Chrome, in this case) would be
free to use all of my usernames, passwords, and websites they are
associated with (for example) in a publication/advertisement to
illustrate that the Password Management feature is fully-functioning.
And that is a right that I could never revoke and is perpetual?

The possibilities are endless and I believe that the scope (both of use
and in demand of rights) of the EULA is overreaching. I would be
interested to know how they would go about exercising these rights that
we are giving them. Would it be an official request that I voluntarily
submit to them everything I've ever typed in or transmitted using
Chrome? Can they capture everything I submit and view and is that done
on demand or all the time? Will my paranoia ever end?

The only comfort to me is that it says that it will be used for the sole
purpose of displaying, distributing and promoting Chrome. It isn't much
comfort but at least I know the scope of what it can be used for. I'd
like the distributing and promoting taken off.

All of that being said, I've tried it and I do appreciate the minimalist
interface and the speed that I've seen so far. I am very excited to see
it progress and see some of the performance enhancements I've witnessed
be incorporated into other products. It's been a little spotty on
loading some pages (yahoo.com, in particular) but still pretty good for
a .2x version.

-----Original Message-----
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 2:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: What no chrome?

Flickr Google?  I thought Flickr is owned by Yahoo.

But as far as the disclaimer - you HAVE to give them those rights in
order for them to legally redisplay the content for you.


On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Kennedy, Jim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone read the EULA? Looks like if upload my photos with it to Flickr
Google gets to use them however they want, although they are kind enough
to let me keep my copyrights.
>
> 11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in
Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services.
By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a
perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive
license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly
perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit,
post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the
sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the
Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the
Additional Terms of those Services.
>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Benjamin Zachary
>> I was surprised no one talked about chrome yesterday.
>> Not too bad, although not sure if the world needs another browser ;)
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>



-- 
ME2

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to