Could someone at Sunbelt please get this guy off the list it is a PITA to
get one of these every time you post.
Jon
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: System Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort
Sent: Wed Sep 17 10:40:02 2008
did not reach the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed Sep 17 10:40:02 2008
The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message
was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient
directly to find out the correct address.
<zhadum.korriban.local #5.1.1>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
X-Supplementary-Info: zhadum.korriban.local
X-Display-Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Jon Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:39:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort
I think you will find that this is the Home user software. Symantec always
labels their Home/SMB stuff as Norton and the Corporate stuff as Symantec.
Until someone I know and trust tells me that Symantec has fixed the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] they handle engine updates and their even worse way of
uninstalling but
leaving a mess behind I would not even consider them again.
Jon
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still waiting to see. Folks have complained publicly about them for
> years, not to mention those who are contract customers, and Symantec is
> somehow **just** getting it?
>
>
>
> <rant on>
>
>
>
> Dollars talk. If not for the Altiris acquisition, Symantec would be losing
> money miserably. They have lost a lot of AV/Security customers over the
> last couple years. So – do they care about protecting the customer? Nope.
> They care about the bank statements. Granted, that's what companies do and
> there's nothing wrong with making money, but I wish they'd stop with the
> political spin
>
>
>
> </rant off>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:22 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort
>
>
>
> http://www.stuff.co.nz/4668507a28.html
>
>
>
> Quote:
>
> "But is it still protecting us properly? Symantec assures me it is, and
> even better than ever."
>
>
>
> OK, I'm a believer :-) At least it sounds like they have finally understood
> their fatal flaw and are making attempts to fix it.
>
>
>
>
>
> …Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
