Sorry for the delay guys. The offending email address [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was not a registered member of NTSysAdmins. After some digging we believe we found the email account that was forwarding to the .local domain. Please let us know if any other bounce backs are being received on new messages to the list.
Thanks again for the patience. Thank you, Fred Sawyer Sunbelt Software ________________________________ From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort Could someone at Sunbelt please get this guy off the list it is a PITA to get one of these every time you post. Jon ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: System Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM Subject: Undeliverable: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Your message To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort Sent: Wed Sep 17 10:40:02 2008 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed Sep 17 10:40:02 2008 The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. <zhadum.korriban.local #5.1.1> Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 X-Supplementary-Info: zhadum.korriban.local X-Display-Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Jon Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:39:43 -0400 Subject: Re: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort I think you will find that this is the Home user software. Symantec always labels their Home/SMB stuff as Norton and the Corporate stuff as Symantec. Until someone I know and trust tells me that Symantec has fixed the [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> way they handle engine updates and their even worse way of uninstalling but leaving a mess behind I would not even consider them again. Jon On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Still waiting to see. Folks have complained publicly about them for years, not to mention those who are contract customers, and Symantec is somehow *just* getting it? <rant on> Dollars talk. If not for the Altiris acquisition, Symantec would be losing money miserably. They have lost a lot of AV/Security customers over the last couple years. So - do they care about protecting the customer? Nope. They care about the bank statements. Granted, that's what companies do and there's nothing wrong with making money, but I wish they'd stop with the political spin </rant off> From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Interesting read on Symantec's latest effort http://www.stuff.co.nz/4668507a28.html Quote: "But is it still protecting us properly? Symantec assures me it is, and even better than ever." OK, I'm a believer :-) At least it sounds like they have finally understood their fatal flaw and are making attempts to fix it. ...Tim ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
