I've never understood how that is never mind tolerated, but even allowed. On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Chinnery, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Finally, what bothers me is all those Congressmen looking at all those > dollars and thinking, "My <fill in the blank: my party, myself, > constituents> could use some of that. How about we just tack on a few more > billion." And all of a sudden, when the bill is signed, it's $100 billion > more. > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 1:52 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: $700B? > > I get that background, but I've not heard anyone reliable say that Paulson > is actually a shady character. I've heard vague accusations that he's only > doing this to bail out his buddies, but no evidence to indicate that that's > truly his type of personality. It would take a horrible person to gamble > with $700 billion in taxpayer money just to profit his cronies. I'm not > saying such people don't exist—only that by all accounts, Paulson isn't one > of them. > > > > > > > > > > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 1:10 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: $700B? > > > > As long as the list is going tilt today much like our finances, I'd > seriously look at Paulson's history before I said that I trust him….I'm with > John, I clearly don't understand it all but the bi-partisan resistance is > noteworthy… > > > > Excerpt from a transcript of a public radio show I heard the other night > that was rather illuminating….granted it's slanted to the left but facts are > facts > > > > "I found this article in BusinessWeek that ran when Paulson was appointed to > the Treasury, and I just want to read you one sentence, because I think it's > all we need to know about Henry Paulson. This is from BusinessWeek, when he > got the appointment as Treasury Secretary in 2006. The headline of the > article is "Mr. Risk Goes to Washington." It says, "Think of Paulson as Mr. > Risk. He's one of the key architects of a more daring Wall Street, where > securities firms are taking greater and greater chances in [their] pursuit > of profits. By some key measures, the securities industry is more leveraged > now than it was at the height of the 1990s boom." > > > Then it goes on to say that when Paulson took over Goldman Sachs in 1999, > they had $20 billion in debts. When he—in these high-risk gambles. When he > left, they had $100 billion, which means he took their risk level from $20 > billion to $100 billion. So it is absolutely no exaggeration to say that > Henry Paulson, far from speaking for Main Street, is actually bailing out > his colleagues for some of the very debts that he himself accumulated. This > is an extraordinary conflict of interest." > > > > After I heard that, I went and read the actual article- > http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_24/b3988001.htm > > > > Scary stuff….seems like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse to me. > > > > You may now return to your regularly scheduled programming… J > > > > > > From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:47 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: $700B? > > > > I will say this… It's a complex issue, and there are few who truly > understand it. I'm not one of those few. > > > > Among those few are Bernanke, Paulson, and Buffett (Warren, not Jimmy). I've > gotta say, I'm leaning towards trusting their judgment on this. > > > > From: Devin Meade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:29 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: $700B? > > > > 700 Billion / 300 Million = $2,333. Thats what every resident (legal and > non-legal) will be paying to bail out the crooks. How bout sending US a > check instead. Shutting up now. > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Eldridge, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like the idea going around to reverse the "trickle down" and start at the > bottom and let 700b flow upwards. J > > > > From: Vue, Za [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:33 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: $700B? > > > > This sounds more like a ransom from the master of evil for wanting to take > over Earth or a Lewis Farrakhan lawsuit. > > > > -Z.V. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of > the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution > or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly > prohibited. > > If you have received this message in error, please contact > the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the > original message (including attachments). > > > > > > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. > > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication > in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer > system. > > > > > > > > > -- > Devin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
