I have to agree with the rest of you. I now rate Symantec down at the bottom
of the pile with Computer Associates. Not sure which is the worst anymore.

To quote other members of this list.

"CA - where good software goes to die"

Len

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Paul Muhlbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's not often I chime in on these topics. I must say my experience
> watching Symantec purchase other companies is the same as Micheal's.
> Central Point Software - Great  - till Symantec killed it.
> Veritas - great company - then Symantec buys it.
> Lastly - Powerquest.  Is Symantec truly doing anything about imaging for
> Vista? How about partition changes? They may be, I haven't looked too hard.
> Yet, I can't say I am that thrilled.
>
> I still have them for Antivirus. Yet, I wonder sometimes, if I should be
> re-evaluating soon.  I believe there is a new product from Sunbelt <grin>.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>
> >>> "Benjamin Zachary - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/3/2008 9:02 PM >>>
>  Yeah I cant argue with you on it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 4:43 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Symantec NetBackup vs Iron Mountain's Connected Backup/PC
>
> Well, my problem is with the company itself; and what they do to
> perfectly good pieces of software over time. In that respect I no
> longer consider them trustworthy.
>
> But, I know you've heard this all before.
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Benjamin Zachary - Lists
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Haha, actually I thought the netbackup was decent as a standalone piece.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 6:58 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: Symantec NetBackup vs Iron Mountain's Connected Backup/PC
> >
> > You forgot:
> >
> > Symantec = teh suck.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Benjamin Zachary - Lists
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Iron mountain = hosted
> >> Netbackup  = internal
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hitesh Wadhwani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:15 PM
> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Symantec NetBackup vs Iron Mountain's Connected Backup/PC
> >>
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> Do any of you have any experience with the two products? How do they
> > compare for laptop/desktop backups? Also how does Altiris Recovery
> Solution
> > compare to both products and are there any other products you can
> recommend
> > over either Symantec or Iron Mountain for PC Backups?
> >>
> >> Just looking for information on this.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> H
> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ME2
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ME2
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>



-- 
Len Hammond
Hammond Enterprises
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to