Well, if the list software (stupid L*rys) didn't set the replyto
header poorly, this wouldn't be such a problem.

Still, OOO replies are stupid, and potentially dangerous.

Kurt

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Edward B. DREGER
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I normally get a few OOOs in response to a post... but _thirteen_ just
> now?!
>
> Hint:  If a message is addressed to a list (not to oneself), from a
> list server, et cetera, an OOO response might not be appropriate.  And
> telling random people that you'll be out of state for two months is
> unwise from a security perspective.
>
>
> Eddy
> --
> Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
> A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
> Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
> ________________________________________________________________________
> DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
> [email protected] -*- [email protected] -*- [email protected]
> Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
> Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to