RW> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:09:50 -0500 RW> From: Roger Wright RW> I have a rule that sends 95% of the OoO's I receive to a separate RW> folder. Easy enough to manage that way.
Yes, except I want to see non-list OOOs... so I don't apply such a broad rule. If I'm going to use a big hammer, it usually involves feeding my spam filter, after which one's MX is presumed junk until it demonstrates otherwise. (That goes double for Barracuda and other broken spam-backscattering mail gateways.) While ranting about mail handling: Does anyone else wish that Outlook set "In-Reply-To" and "References" properly? Or am I the only person who uses a properly-threaded MUA? Ah, well. Back to work. Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: [email protected] -*- [email protected] -*- [email protected] Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
