I used Virtuozo in an "earlier life" (i.e., when I was working for someone else). I was VERY impressed with the performance and the control available in that environment, both for Linux and Windows.
Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -----Original Message----- From: Michael D Faulkner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Thin Client Longevity Actually looking at Parallel's Virtuozzo. Interesting variation. The PC "containers" use the base OS, but are segregated from it somewhat in terms of configuration. Excellent density under 64-bit hosts. Licensing and hardware requirements are reasonable. The broker they recommend, Provision Quest, does require a thin client running XPe to utilize of all its' features. -----Original Message----- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Thin Client Longevity Id say, virtualize the applications and stream them to VDI workstations, and connect to Thin clients and skip the workstation refresh and have applications on demand, without the need for VM spawl. You get the application on the vm you log into based on what group you are in and best of all, its all virtual so you aren't loading the entire application on the PC makes it simple to just reboot the VM in undoable mode and be done with it. Either that or use Terminal Services with Virtualized applications and use RDP to serve them up, again skipping workstation refresh, why even spend the time on Citrix anymore, it's a PITA to admin and profiles, and printers, YUCK.. Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: [email protected] Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Thin Client Longevity On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Michael D Faulkner <[email protected]> wrote: > One selling point to my boss is telling him that thin clients running XPe > potentially can skip one workstation refresh and save a bunch. But I'm > wondering if there are any new technologies coming down the road that might > require a client purchase in the next eight year or so and make this > argument incorrect! You might want to take a look at this: http://thinstation.sourceforge.net/features.html ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
