Yes , I made that with a remote Office connection to SBS2k3 and was necessary an additional HDSL 2MB connection . But it is very stable and performant and delivered also VOICE IP for the internal lines
_____ Da: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]] Inviato: ven 06/03/2009 14.22 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Site to Site VPN? Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally. From: N Parr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Why spend that when you could do it with a couple ASA's and DSL/Cable Connections. _____ From: HELP_PC [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Site to Site VPN? Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (1800 or 2800 series) GuidoElia HELPPC _____ Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] Inviato: giovedì 5 marzo 2009 20.54 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Site to Site VPN? We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near future for a small office, about 20 users. Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I tried a SonicWall once, it was way over my head, and support was horrendous. This will operate solely as 2 VPN endpoints to connect 2 LANs. Users needing remote access already have Win 2003 RRAS in place. Thanks for any input, Sam http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9923/ps9928/data_sheet_c78-496735.html ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
