We've not run into any app compatibility issues with it. The only files we make 
available offline are My Documents (and the related stuff like My Music) and 
the desktop. We use folder redirection for these so that users' files will 
automatically be backed up to a server. Because we want them to be able to 
access those files even during a network outage (or at home, in the case of 
laptop users), we also use offline files.

We used to have people's stuff stored in 
\\SomeServer\SomeShare<file:///\\SomeServer\SomeShare>. I realized what a bad 
idea that was, because "SomeServer" wasn't always going to be around. So over 
the Christmas holidays I switched to DFS and modified the GPO to point to 
\\OurDomain\dfs\whatever<file:///\\OurDomain\dfs\whatever> and pointed 
\\OurDomain\dfs\whatever<file:///\\OurDomain\dfs\whatever> to 
\\SomeServer\SomeShare<file:///\\SomeServer\SomeShare>. But if a user had 
logged into a machine before Christmas but not since, that machine was still 
looking for \\SomeServer\SomeShare<file:///\\SomeServer\SomeShare> to sync 
their files. And with XP, whenever any user that uses offline files logs in, 
the machine apparently tries to sync files for every user who had ever logged 
in (even users who hadn't logged in for months).

Which was okay, except that on Monday \\SomeServer<file:///\\SomeServer> went 
away. The files stored in SomeShare were actually on a PowerVault, which I 
relocated to \\NewServer<file:///\\NewServer>. I configured DFS to make 
\\NewServer\SomeShare<file:///\\NewServer\SomeShare> the new target for  
\\OurDomain\dfs\whatever<file:///\\OurDomain\dfs\whatever>, and all worked well 
except for the machines that were still convinced that 
\\SomeServer<file:///\\SomeServer> was out there somewhere.

The moral of this story is, for crying out loud use DFS whenever possible. 
Especially for things like roaming profiles and redirected folders. It makes 
life a whole lot easier when changes have to be made, and sooner or later 
changes ALWAYS have to be made.

The other thing I learned is that the next time I buy a big storage device, 
it's going to plug directly into the network instead of connecting to a server. 
It's too much of a pain to have one physically tied to a particular server, 
especially if that server needs to be decommissioned and replaced.





From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Offline Files Question

Are these offline file administratively assigned, and has that list been 
updated?  My guess is yes to the former, no to the latter based on the fact 
that users couldn't modify offline files.  Of course, I could be talking out of 
my hat, because I'm out of my experience base.
I stamped out Offline Files here a while ago.  The previous admin was in love 
with it, me not so much, and it caused some problems for a number of our 
applications.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, John Hornbuckle 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

One thing I should add... I'm not looking to disable offline files. We're still 
using that feature-just with a different server. So I need XP to stop trying to 
synch with the old server that no longer exists (or to at least stop fussing 
that it can't reach that server)...







From: John Hornbuckle 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:16 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Offline Files Question



Crap... Just realized I had applied those policies at a higher level than I 
meant to. So they were applying to everyone, rather than just a specific subset 
of users who need offline files. Gotta fix that.







From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Offline Files Question



http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc759721.aspx



Per the article, the behavior you're describing looks like you've disabled user 
configuration of offline files, but haven't disabled offline files.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:01 PM, John Hornbuckle 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

We recently decommissioned a server, but a number of XP machines are still 
trying to synch files with it using the Offline Files feature.



I found this article:



http://support.microsoft.com/kb/230738



But on the SP3 machines we've checked, there is no "Offline Files" tab under 
Folder Options. Besides, we have too many machines doing this for us to 
manually go around to each one.



Anyone know of a way to clear this up en masse (group policy, login script, 
etc.)?



This appears to be unique to XP; offline files don't behave the same way with 
Vista. With XP, every time any user logs in or out, the machine tries to synch 
offline files for any user who has ever logged into that machine (even if the 
current user has no offline files). And if it hits an error-which it always 
will, because it's trying to synch with a server that no longer exists-the 
machine will hang on shutdown until the user clicks a button.







John Hornbuckle

MIS Department

Taylor County School District

www.taylor.k12.fl.us<http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us/>































~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to