I will try that.

I'm not terribly familiar with SQLServer - my last major work on it
was back in the 7.0 days, so I appreciate the help.

Kurt

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:37, Andy Ognenoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> When you put the name in manually, are you sure it's not trying to use Named
> Pipes instead of TCP/IP...that could also be why it doesn’t show up when you
> search for it.
>
> I always go into the Client Network Utility on the server running the DTS
> package and create a TCP/IP only alias and name it something like
> SERVERNAME-IP - usually does the trick.
>
>  - Andy O.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:53 PM
>>To: NT System Admin Issues
>>Subject: Re: SQLServer 200 question - DTS to DMZ
>>
>>We are able to specify the name of the machine manually while setting
>>up the DTS package in the Administrator GUI, but when connecting it
>>comes back with "Error 11: General network error. Check your network
>>documentation." and I get no further.
>>
>>Kurt
>>
>>On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 13:24, Mayo, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> My recollection is that you can free-form type in a server name in SQL2K
>>> DTS connections.  Is that not the case?  We have accomplished what you
>>> are describing here with no major problems.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:58 PM
>>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>>> Subject: SQLServer 200 question - DTS to DMZ
>>>
>>> Anyone know how this works? My DBA is trying to set up a DTS connection
>>> to push data from our production DB to a SQLServer box in the DMZ.
>>>
>>> I've got port 1433 open from from the production machine to the DMZ
>>> machine, and name resolution is good - I've set up a static DNS entry
>>> - but when trying to set up the DTS package through the wizard the
>>> machine in the DMZ doesn't appear in the dropdown list, which makes some
>>> sense to me as it's a standalone box, not on the domain.
>>>
>>> I'm also open to the idea that DTS isn't the right way of doing this,
>>> but I don't know what the alternatives would be.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any help much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>
>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>
>>>
>>
>>~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to