I was under the impression that like the current version of Forefront if you
did not have one of the System Center products it would install a cut down
version that only dealt with Forefront.  From what I saw on my installation
the reason for SQL WAS the MOM package.  I just hope that Sterling will work
with SCE.  I have that up and running now.  I would not mind doing a
re-install when Streling is released IF it works well together.  The down
side is that Sterling is supposed to go Gold about the time for our
renewal.  Man I would really hate to be one of the first to roll that
package.

Jon

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  Yeah,
>
> I read some more last night. The component that manages non server clients
> needs SQL 2005. The console that could only manage server components can use
> SQL2000+ and Express.
>
>
>
> What’s worse is the Beta for the next version needs SQL and SCOM from what
> I read.
>
>
>
> Lame…
>
> jlc
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 01, 2009 6:50 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Forefront
>
>
>
> Try and install a working version without the full SQL.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Joseph L. Casale <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >I was just not happen that our resellar did not make the SQL
> requirement clear up front.
>
>
>
> I am just reading the installation Guide and it suggests:
>
> “SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition (and above), SQL Server 2005 Express
> Edition, or SQL Server 2000”
>
>
>
> You have more than 2000 users? I saw somewhere that 2000 users was the
> limit I think for Express…
>
> That would make this cheap? $100.00 per console, and $13.00 per client.
>
>
>
> jlc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to