I agree in general. But I can understand the opposite view - people write the product first and release it. It then gets used in ways that are unintended. Now, in Microsoft's case, there are commerical imperatives that stop them from changing the product to suit actual usage. But on the other hand, there are people who followed the release guidance and will get screwed if MS changes the product. So it's some lose-lose catch 22 situation.
Cheers Ken ________________________________________ From: John Hornbuckle [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 29 May 2009 11:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Amusing This says so much right here... It's a common trap IT people fall into. We tell people that the way they want to use the technology isn't the right way to use it. Huh? Why not? Technology exists to serve humans--not vice versa. I agree that e-mail is an efficient means of distributing and storing files. But the fact is, that's how many people WANT to use e-mail. It's how they use e-mail at home (encouraged by services like GMail, no less). Why should we force them to change to adapt to the technology rather than designing technology that adapts to them? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -----Original Message----- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Amusing They want to use email the way they want to. And why are we telling them they're wrong? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
