I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf counter you won't see anything near a 10x reduction.
-sc -----Original Message----- From: John Hornbuckle <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Amusing Ill have to ponder that one a bit. Not sure I like it. Disks may be cheap, but eliminating SIS would cause storage requirements to increase by an order of magnitude. The OPs situation is a prime example Suddenly a 9 MB storage requirement becomes 2.7 GB storage requirement (if my math is right). From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Amusing 3000x9 Disks are cheap, Exchange 2010 is designed to run RAID-less on large SATA (e.g. 1TB) drives. 1 database per SATA drive TX logs & DB on the same volume. Thanks, Brian Desmond [email protected] c - 312.731.3132 Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/ <http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/> Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian <https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian> From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Amusing How does Ex 2010 work regarding SIS? If it doesnt use it, does it use some similar technology? Or would the OPs 9 MB file now take 3000x9 MB of space? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
