Odd. Maybe that's why some of my messages aren't getting responses.
I just figured it was because everyone knows I'm an idiot, and didn't worry about it. Heh. On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:07, Joe Tinney<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm subscribed via email. > > Invisible by email = sad. Invisible in person = superpower. Who knew! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:04 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating after > patching this weekend > > You are invisible. > > This is the first post I've seen from you in a while. > > Are you using the forum interface, or subscribed via email? > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:42, Joe Tinney<[email protected]> wrote: >> Am I invisible here? Do I need more life points or something? First my >> version questions skims by and now a repeat suggestion (though those do >> happen quite often and you can't always catch every reply). Candee at least >> had a link and that is more useful than me just throwing it out there. Oh, >> well. >> >> WTB LifePoints4NTSysAdmin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:37 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating after >> patching this weekend >> >> This happened to me when I installed Office SP2. >> I found this: >> http://almostdailytech.com/tag/office-2007-sp2/ >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Micheal Espinola >> Jr<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Sorry for neglecting that bitÿÿ For the people I am involved with, its been >>> 2007.ÿ But it hasn't been everyone. >>> >>> -- >>> ME2 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Rob Bonfiglio <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> What verion(s) of Outlook? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've seen sporadic reports online, and can confirm sporadic instances >>>>> within an organization I deal with, that some systems that had patches >>>>> applied over the weekend that were installed via AU caused Outlook to "try >>>>> to start for the first timeÿÿÂ This process, along with the standard >>>>> startup >>>>> dialog that many of us are familiar with also came with a dialog box that >>>>> appeared to be an automatic archive (two folders passing papers with a >>>>> changing list of folders being processed.) >>>>> >>>>> In every case I am aware of; automatic updates was *not* enabled. >>>>> >>>>> I have been unable at this time to research further or confirm if an >>>>> archiving actually took placÿÿÂ Someone also posted about it in the MS >>>>> forums: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general&tid=f53bb4ee-9c15-434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1&mid=f53bb4ee-9c15-434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ME2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ÿÿÂ ~ >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ÿ ~ >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
