Seems to be? I'll dig up the lists support email address and see if Sunbelt knows what might be going on. Thanks for letting me know and glad to see the issue explained/resolved.
We've not yet rolled out SP2 (in testing for the moment) but plan on issuing some corporate communication regarding the PST optimization to mitigate the calls. But, oh, will there be calls, anyway! :) From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: Joe Tinney Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating after patching this weekend Same here. You have been invisible, Joe. Your posts haven't making it through the list. Not kidding. Seems to be OK now though? -- ME2 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: You are invisible. This is the first post I've seen from you in a while. Are you using the forum interface, or subscribed via email? On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:42, Joe Tinney<[email protected]> wrote: > Am I invisible here? Do I need more life points or something? First my version questions skims by and now a repeat suggestion (though those do happen quite often and you can't always catch every reply). Candee at least had a link and that is more useful than me just throwing it out there. Oh, well. > > WTB LifePoints4NTSysAdmin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:37 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating after patching this weekend > > This happened to me when I installed Office SP2. > I found this: > http://almostdailytech.com/tag/office-2007-sp2/ > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Micheal Espinola > Jr<[email protected]> wrote: >> Sorry for neglecting that bit. For the people I am involved with, its been >> 2007. But it hasn't been everyone. >> >> -- >> ME2 >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Rob Bonfiglio <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> What verion(s) of Outlook? >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've seen sporadic reports online, and can confirm sporadic instances >>>> within an organization I deal with, that some systems that had patches >>>> applied over the weekend that were installed via AU caused Outlook to "try >>>> to start for the first time". This process, along with the standard startup >>>> dialog that many of us are familiar with also came with a dialog box that >>>> appeared to be an automatic archive (two folders passing papers with a >>>> changing list of folders being processed.) >>>> >>>> In every case I am aware of; automatic updates was *not* enabled. >>>> >>>> I have been unable at this time to research further or confirm if an >>>> archiving actually took place. Someone also posted about it in the MS >>>> forums: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=mi crosoft.public.outlook.general&tid=f53bb4ee-9c15-434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e& cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1&mid=f53bb4ee-9c15-434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ME2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
