Oy! On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 14:10, Steven M. Caesare<[email protected]> wrote: > As was my reply... ;-) > > -sc > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:52 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating >> after patching this weekend >> >> It was a joke... >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:44, Steven M. Caesare<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Why would everybody worry about you being an idiot? >> > >> > -sc >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:12 PM >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating >> >> after patching this weekend >> >> >> >> Odd. >> >> >> >> Maybe that's why some of my messages aren't getting responses. >> >> >> >> I just figured it was because everyone knows I'm an idiot, and >> didn't >> >> worry about it. >> >> >> >> Heh. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:07, Joe Tinney<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I'm subscribed via email. >> >> > >> >> > Invisible by email = sad. Invisible in person = superpower. Who >> knew! >> >> > >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:04 PM >> >> > To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> > Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving >> activating >> >> after patching this weekend >> >> > >> >> > You are invisible. >> >> > >> >> > This is the first post I've seen from you in a while. >> >> > >> >> > Are you using the forum interface, or subscribed via email? >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:42, Joe Tinney<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> Am I invisible here? Do I need more life points or something? >> First >> >> my version questions skims by and now a repeat suggestion (though >> those >> >> do happen quite often and you can't always catch every reply). >> Candee >> >> at least had a link and that is more useful than me just throwing it >> >> out there. Oh, well. >> >> >> >> >> >> WTB LifePoints4NTSysAdmin >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> >> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:37 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving >> activating >> >> after patching this weekend >> >> >> >> >> >> This happened to me when I installed Office SP2. >> >> >> I found this: >> >> >> http://almostdailytech.com/tag/office-2007-sp2/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Micheal Espinola >> >> >> Jr<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Sorry for neglecting that b П ╤ П ╨ а For the people I am >> >> >>> involved >> with, >> >> its been >> >> >>> 20 ╤ П ╤ а But it hasn't been everyone. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> ME2 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Rob Bonfiglio >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> What verion(s) of Outlook? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr >> >> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> I've seen sporadic reports online, and can confirm sporadic >> >> instances >> >> >>>>> within an organization I deal with, that some systems that had >> >> patches >> >> >>>>> applied over the weekend that were installed via AU caused >> >> Outlook to "try >> >> >>>>> to start for the first tim П ╨ П т ╤ а This process, along >> >> >>>>> with >> the >> >> standard startup >> >> >>>>> dialog that many of us are familiar with also came with a >> dialog >> >> box that >> >> >>>>> appeared to be an automatic archive (two folders passing >> papers >> >> with a >> >> >>>>> changing list of folders being processed.) >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> In every case I am aware of; automatic updates was *not* >> enabled. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> I have been unable at this time to research further or confirm >> if >> >> an >> >> >>>>> archiving actually took pl П ╤ П ╨ П ┬а Someone also posted >> >> >>>>> about >> it in >> >> the MS >> >> >>>>> forums: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en- >> >> us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general&tid=f53bb4ee- >> 9c15- >> >> 434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1&mid=f53bb4ee-9c15- >> 434d- >> >> aab9-05c45017ba4e >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >>>>> ME2 >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! >> ~ >> >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE- >> Enterpri П ╨ П ╤ П ╨ а~ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! >> ~ >> >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> > ╤ П ┬а~ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ┬а~ >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ╤ а~ >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ┬а~ >> > >> > >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ┬а~ >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
