Nope, a week was all we could get to test it a couple of years ago.  The
reporting that was my requirements was that I wanted to delegate it to the
managers to report on their employees.  At the time that we were looking,
that capability wasn't there.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Stefan Jafs <[email protected]> wrote:

>  No complaints here on the reporting, allows you to drill down very easy!
> I have 3 Profiles setup, Work , Lunch and off-hours, this way I allow such
> things as FaceBook during Lunch and off-hours, the employees like that!
>
> I have absolutely nothing to complain about,
>
>
>
> I believe they will give you an test appliance free for a month to test, a
> least they used to.
>
>
>
> *___________________________________*
>
> *Stefan Jafs*
>
>
>
> *From:* David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 19, 2009 1:05 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Iprism
>
>
>
> Not sure how long ago you are referring to, but since 2004/2005 (when we
> got our first appliance), we've always got detailed reporting.
>
> (user account, computer, ip address)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 19, 2009 12:50 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Iprism
>
> We demo'd an iPrism a couple of years ago, the reason we didn't go with it
> was the reporting, or rather lack of reporting.  Detailed reporting (userid
> based) was non-existent, and reporting was a major requirement for us, so it
> was the right fit.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Rod Trent <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Total cost?
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> iPrism is ROCK solid.
>
> very easy to setup.
>
> very easy to manage.
>
> works well with direct clients, proxy clients, citrix clients, VPN
> clients..etc...etc...etc...
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Rod Trent [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 19, 2009 12:15 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* re: Iprism
>
> MessageLabs works well.
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Anyone use Iprism from St. Bernard?  Currently on a teleconference demo
> with them.  Anyone with experience that can share thoughts?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jay
>
>
>
> *Jay Dale •* I.T. Director
>
> Xpresstel, Inc • Telecom & I.T. Solutions
> 8515 Jackrabbit Rd• Ste T• Houston, TX  77095
> Office: 281-856-8335 • Fax: 281-856-8399
>
> http://www.xpresstel.com
>
> *THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS A PRIVILEGED
> FIRM-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, WORK PRODUCT AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION OF
> INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF
> THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
> NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR  COPYING OF THIS
> COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS EMAIL IN
> ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY SEND A REPLY AND DELETE THE EMAIL PROMPTLY.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
> Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
> or attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to