I've been on both ends of the spectrum, Desktop Support now SE. I can
understand the view from their side when an end-user is breathing down
their neck so much that they get tunnel-vision and only care about
fixing the immediate issue the fastest way possible so the end-user can
do their job.

 

Don Guyer

Systems Engineer - Information Services

Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group

431 W. Lancaster Avenue

Devon, PA 19333

Direct: (610) 993-3299

Fax: (610) 650-5306

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

 

+1!!   The mindset is COMPLETELY different.

 

Desktop Support: Make it work! Reg hack, add-in, whatever, just make it
run.

Systems Engineer: Make everything consistent so it *ALL* works with a
minimum of exceptions. Automate and have central management on
everything possible.

 

In my experience the biggest difference is "thinking in scale". Typical
desktop guys think 1:1 and don't take into consideration the ability to
scale out a specific change or fix. SE's think on one-to-many.

 

In fact as two of my personal biz clients I replaced the previous tech's
who were basically "desktop types", and it was quite apparent when
looking at the AD configuration...

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 8:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Apple vs Microsoft?

 

A bench tech does not a network guru make.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

I used to work for a consulting firm that actually had both MS and Apple
techs.  The mac techs were so excited about the I-Server and of course
convinced that it would lead the the short demise of all windows
servers. 

 

Their first install started at 4 pm on a Friday, they were replacing a
SBS with this new MAC. It NEVER crossed their minds that they might need
an MS tech to help at all with this migration.

 

They called me at 5 p.m. on Saturday.  NOTHING worked on either server.


 

These were 2 FULLY certified MAC specialists who were approved to do
warrantee work for most everything Apple.

 

The "manual" for the xserve looked like it had been written by a sales
person.  It looks to me like no one in that whole org knows JACK about
networking.

 

They had not even considered looking at the firewall portion.....  well
anyway, maybe the guys I worked with were the biggest part of that
problem, but I don't think so.  I think both of them were  better than
average for MAC techs, but they were lost on server side, and the EASY
interface didn't do the job for them.

 

It does have some COOL features.  You can pull up any mac's current
session and watch them work without them knowing it...  Wow.

 

 

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Link
<[email protected]> wrote:

Sure you are.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

:-)

 

-Jonathan

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:16 AM, James Rankin <[email protected]>
wrote:

        Stick an Apple logon on a lump of Steve Jobs' vomit and Mac
users would claim it tasted like pumpkin pie, and looked much cooler
than Microsoft puke
        
        This is from someone who is sick of hearing a colleague Apple
fan-boy bigging up their iPhone by showing us how "useful" it is, from
the lightsabre noises it can make to the fact that there is an app for
everything (including the cure for AIDS)
        
        Not wanting to reignite the old MS v Apple debate or anything
:-)

        2009/7/15 David Lum <[email protected]>

        Your boss might want to consider how hard it may or may not be
to find someone to handle the XSERVE thing as well, the talent pool will
be smaller and (I would expect) the salaries to be higher. I know of
some Mac users that love their Macs unless they need help with it,
because so many folks are PC types..

         

        Also "I have been told that 150 users can be better managed on
two XSERVE's than on a Windows Active directory network"

        Have them define "manage". I would expect it manages Mac's
better J.

        David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
        NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
        (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

        P.S. I have to LOL Za, I have a Optiplex 745 with 64-bit XP
running VMWare Workstation and it is hosting my dev environment: SQL
server, web server, misc. development servers (W2K8, Moss2K7, SCCM, etc)
and a VM of Win XP. Of course, I can only power up about 4 VM's at a
time, but...

         

        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------

         

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Vue, Za [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:19 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues

        Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

         

        Where does the boss get the idea that a Mac environment will be
a better long term move?

         

        I still manage one Xserve. Attached to it is an Xraid with 16
hard drives. Used exclusively for data storage. One 400 GB hard drive
failed in last 3 years. Controller B was also replaced on the X-Raid.
The server is attached to a Win08 AD.  Overall the system works well but
I am just not a proponent of Mac OS. AD integration has greatly improved
with the latest OS.

         

        A Dell Optiplex running Windows 2008 for under $1000 can handle
150 users but maybe your company has money to spend. Get two Optiplex'es
and cluster them and attach a disk array. The cheapest single Xserve is
currently $2999.00 and comes only with a 7200 160gig HD. Customize the
system to your requirements and you are looking at $6000-$7000 per
server. Just to remote into the server requires a $300 extra software.
Crazy man.. I torrent the damn thing instead. :)

         

        I have a Dell Optiplex 745, 3.0 Ghz, 6/GB RAM, 2x250 GB HD set
up as a 64/bit Win08 DC and print server for 23 networked printers. I
have 160 users & 400+ students in the department. The darn thing is as
quiet as my laptop.

         

         

        -Z.V.

        ________________________________________

        From: Shawn [[email protected]]

        Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:01 PM

        To: NT System Admin Issues

        Subject: Apple vs Microsoft?

         

        Does anyone here have any experience, good or bad, regarding the
Apple XSERVE being utilized to host email, data storage, open directory,
etc as an equivalent replacement for Microsoft Server? We are currently
running SBS 2003 and have 40 users, but will soon be upping that number
to 150. My boss insists that moving everything over to a Mac environment
will be a better long term move, but I am a bit hesitant without having
some outside data to back that up.

         

        I have been told that 150 users can be better managed on two
XSERVE's than on a Windows Active directory network, yet I have had a
rough time finding any direct comparisons.

         

        If any of you have experience running either a mixed environment
with both OS X Server and Windows Server or just a pure OS X environment
w/ Mac clients as well, I would be interested to hear what your take on
this is.

         

        I would also be very interested to here from anyone that has
done a migration from Active directory to Open directory, along with any
challenges on the user end. What challenges did you face? Are there any
specifics that you can offer regarding stability, administration, etc?

         

        Thanks in advance for any input you can provide.

         

        Shawn

        ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~

        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

         

        ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~

        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

         

         

        This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole
use of

        the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged

        information.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

        recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution

        or copying of this message (including any attachments) is
strictly

        prohibited.

         

        If you have received this message in error, please contact

        the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the

        original message (including attachments).

         

        ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~

        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

         

         

         

         

         

        
        
        
        -- 
        "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you
put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I
am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that
could provoke such a question."
        
        http://raythestray.blogspot.com
<http://raythestray.blogspot.com/> 

         

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to