On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:20 PM, John Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, I get the point ...
I'm not sure you do... > ... it all boils down to storage. Or design. The inability to easily restore a single mailbox is not a good thing. Maybe there are tech trade-offs that make that design limitation necessary. Maybe it's a consequence of some fundamental design decisions made a long time ago, and which aren't easily changed. Maybe it's just something we have to live with, and other capabilities make it worth it. But calling people stupid in an effort to defend that limitation? That's counter to any possibility for progress and improvement, and rude besides. There are two ways to approach any obstacle: One can look for reasons why not, or one can look for ways how. I know which approach I prefer. > There has to be a reason there are so many Exchange installations > out there and it's not because they were the first mail server on the block. If population is your chief metric, then one must conclude that cockroaches are superior to humans. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
